Measuring progress towards transport sustainability through indicators: Analysis and metrics of the main indicator initiatives

Sdoukopoulos, Alexandros; Pitsiava–Latinopoulou, Magda; Basbas, Socrates; Papaioannou, Panagiotis

doi:10.1016/j.trd.2018.11.020

Cited by 109 publications

(80 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Objectives are short-term, low-level steps for goal attainment, which are specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and time bound. To support the development of indicator sets for the transport sector, Sdoukopoulos et al [46] summarised a general iterative method, while Castillo and Pitfield [47] presented an Evaluative and Logical Approach to Sustainable Transport Indicator Compilation (ELASTIC) framework consisting of six procedures. In [41], a seven-step method grounded in MCA for measuring the overall sustainability of cities was proposed.…”

Section: Methods and Procedures Of Indicator Set Generationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Developing Goals and Indicators for the Design of Sustainable and Integrated Transport Infrastructure and Urban Spaces

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper aims to provide a framework for policy-makers and transportation and urban design professionals to evaluate alternative urban plans and infrastructure design, allowing them to select a set of locally relevant indicators to help assess scenarios considering sustainable development and overall system performance improvement in line with specific project goals. Using methods of systematic review, content analysis, multi-criteria analysis, and expert consultation, a three-level goal system is proposed, leading to the generation of 64 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), both qualitative and quantitative, and an indicator set of 227 items. To allow stakeholders to apply their own set of indicators, the approaches and tools of measuring these indicators as well as the ways of using this indicator set are presented to assist decision-makers in evaluating and choosing optimal plans and designs.

show abstract

Section: Methods and Procedures Of Indicator Set Generationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Developing Goals and Indicators for the Design of Sustainable and Integrated Transport Infrastructure and Urban Spaces

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Moving towards transport sustainability requires the constant monitoring and intensive evaluation of the current conditions through broadly accepted methodological tools such as indicators. The review proposed by Sdoukopoulos et al [3] conducted an in-depth analysis based on the indicators included in the 78 initiatives. This analysis contributes to the development of a comprehensive picture of the evaluation process towards transport sustainability and aims at illustrating interesting findings on a number of relevant aspects.…”

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As a consequence, incorporating into transport planning actions inspired to sustainable development principles is of fundamental importance [3]. The economic development models adopted in the past decades were oriented to the economic growth only, without any regard to social or environmental impacts.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Novel Approach for a Sustainability Evaluation of Developing System Interchange: The Case Study of the Sheikhfazolah-Yadegar Interchange, Tehran, Iran

Shishegaran

Mazzulla

et al. 2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To resolve environmental and social problems and traffic congestion, a sustainability evaluation of transportation infrastructure should be done for current and proposed situations. The aim of the present investigation is to evaluate the sustainability of infrastructure project on system interchange and assess their results with respect to sustainable development indicators. Based on interviews with experts, intensive observation, and development infrastructure related to the case study, six proposed scenarios are proposed to improve traffic condition of the Sheikhfazolah-Yadegar interchange in Tehran. The proposed scenarios are modeled and calibrated in AIMSUN 8.0, then the value of all indicators are determined through an indirect and direct procedure by AIMSUN results. A technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method is used to integrate the results of proposed indicators. Although the weight of each indicator specifies its effect in sustainability evaluation, changes intensity of indicator value was not applied in sustainability evaluation by the previous methods of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). In this study, for the first time, a simplified approach is defined and used to evaluate sustainable development of all scenarios that can apply the effect of changes intensity in sustainability evaluation. This method is named the applied effect of changes intensity in each indicator (AECIEI). According to the purposes of Tehran vision in 2025, all proposed scenarios are ranked based on TOPSIS results and the simplified approach, and then results of these methods are compared.

show abstract

“…Seeing the facts, the assessment of performance of the SUT depends on so many indicators, so that could be making it as weakness, i.e., the lack of priority in determining indicators. In addition, each selected indicator needs to clearly refer to each sustainability pillar and depict a typical scenario in the transportation system [17,18]. Hence, this study was conducted to find out the existence of the main indicators that were the parts of previous studies.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modelling Sustainable Urban Transport Performance in the Jakarta city Region: A GIS Approach

Nadi

Murad

2019

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Measuring performance of Sustainable Urban Transport is an important effort to face the challenges of future trends. This study used Geographic Information System (GIS) application for modelling the performance of Sustainable Urban Transport (SUT) in the Jakarta city Region (JCR). The GIS applications include identifying the existing performance of SUT in Jakarta city, exploring the relationships between indicators of SUT, and producing a prediction model of SUT. Research methods used in this study were GIS techniques with geo-reference, classifications, polygon to raster, re-classifications, sum-weighted, ordinary least square (OLS), exploratory regression, and geographic weighted regression (GWR). The results revealed that the SUT model have more capability in measuring the performance of SUTs spatially and simply. This model is to visualize the effect of the indicator on the SUT performance and its influence, respectively. The results of this study also discovered that the JCR’s Sustainable Urban Transport Performance was in medium level. The outputs of this modelling were useful for evaluating the level of SUT performances in the city based on districts area. Overall, this study provides valuable information on the SUT performance of the JCR, also highlights some important challenges faced in the future of SUT program development.

show abstract

Measuring progress towards transport sustainability through indicators: Analysis and metrics of the main indicator initiatives

Cited by 109 publications

References 42 publications

Developing Goals and Indicators for the Design of Sustainable and Integrated Transport Infrastructure and Urban Spaces

Developing Goals and Indicators for the Design of Sustainable and Integrated Transport Infrastructure and Urban Spaces

A Novel Approach for a Sustainability Evaluation of Developing System Interchange: The Case Study of the Sheikhfazolah-Yadegar Interchange, Tehran, Iran

Modelling Sustainable Urban Transport Performance in the Jakarta city Region: A GIS Approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About