Measuring shoulder injury function: Common scales and checklists

Slobogean, Gerard P.; Slobogean, Bronwyn

doi:10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.046

Cited by 44 publications

(51 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Existing evidence [8][9][10] shows that the DASH or QuickDASH, OSS, SPADI and ASES have established psychometric properties. When selecting a PRO for use, psychometric properties and practicality aspects were deemed 'extremely' or 'very' important by 86% of clinicians and 96% of researchers.…”

Section: Psychometric Propertiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Answers are tallied to produce a summary score, which is intended to represent the impact of shoulder pain and dysfunction on an individual's health-related quality of life, with respect to activity limitations and participation restrictions. Studies [7][8][9][10] comparing the performance of commonly used shoulder or upper extremity region-specific PROs have identified at least five measures [Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons standardized assessment form (ASES), and Simple Shoulder Test] with accumulating evidence for the psychometric properties of validity, reliability, responsiveness and practicality across a range of shoulder conditions. The evidence suggests these PROs have psychometrics that are sufficient to evaluate the health status at a single point in time and assess change over time to determine treatment effectiveness.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The evidence suggests these PROs have psychometrics that are sufficient to evaluate the health status at a single point in time and assess change over time to determine treatment effectiveness. [7][8][9][10] There are a large number of psychometrically assessed and validated shoulder-specific, upper extremity region-specific and shoulder disease-specific PROs. This presents a challenge in the evidence-based selection of PROs.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Physiotherapists use of and perspectives on the importance of patient-reported outcome measures for shoulder dysfunction

Payne

Michener

2014

Shoulder & Elbow

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Many patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) for shoulder dysfunctions have acceptable psychometric properties. The present study examined current PRO usage and perceived importance. Methods: Delegates at the 2010 International Congress of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists were invited to participate in this cross-sectional observational study. Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) web-based tools were used to design an online questionnaire, which was e-mailed to participants. Results: Participants (n ¼ 101) reflected an 84% response rate. PRO use was considered 'extremely' or 'very' important by the majority of clinicians (76%) and researchers (98%). Most commonly used as a primary outcome by clinicians and researchers, respectively, were the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder Hand Questionnaire (DASH) (40%, 44%) and the Oxford Shoulder Scale (OSS) (36%, 22%) and, as secondary outcomes, the DASH (33%, 28%), OSS (17%, 8%), the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) (8%,18%), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons standardized assessment form (ASES) (8%, 13%). Psychometric properties were rated as 'extremely' or 'very' important by 86% to 96% of participants. Conclusions: The majority of shoulder therapists consider PRO use to be very important and psychometric properties to be critical in PRO selection. The DASH, OSS, SPADI and ASES are most commonly used in clinical practice and research studies.

show abstract

Section: Psychometric Propertiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Physiotherapists use of and perspectives on the importance of patient-reported outcome measures for shoulder dysfunction

Payne

Michener

2014

Shoulder & Elbow

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Given the vast collection of outcome measures available, choosing an appropriate instrument could be difficult [3]. Despite the fact that many shoulder outcome scales are commonly used in subjects with rotator cuff pathology or instability symptoms, in the shoulder trauma population it could be problematic to select an instrumental evaluation [3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Despite the fact that many shoulder outcome scales are commonly used in subjects with rotator cuff pathology or instability symptoms, in the shoulder trauma population it could be problematic to select an instrumental evaluation [3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%