2014
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring stellar differential rotation with high-precision space-borne photometry

Abstract: Context. Stellar differential rotation is important for understanding hydromagnetic stellar dynamos, instabilities, and transport processes in stellar interiors, as well as for a better treatment of tides in close binary and star-planet systems. Aims. We introduce a method of measuring a lower limit to the amplitude of surface differential rotation from high-precision, evenly sampled photometric time series, such as those obtained by space-borne telescopes. It is designed to be applied to main-sequence late-ty… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
96
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
5
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we only consider stars with V-, I-, J-, and K S -band photometry. We note that the reddening may not only be caused by interstellar, but also by circumstellar reddening (Lebzelter 2011) The corrected colours show a reasonable agreement with the empirical calibrations of Worthey & Lee (2011). However, there are two groups of stars that do not follow this trend.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Here we only consider stars with V-, I-, J-, and K S -band photometry. We note that the reddening may not only be caused by interstellar, but also by circumstellar reddening (Lebzelter 2011) The corrected colours show a reasonable agreement with the empirical calibrations of Worthey & Lee (2011). However, there are two groups of stars that do not follow this trend.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…A total of 434 stars were found with previously determined periods (Lebzelter 2011;De Medeiros et al 2013). For approximately 96% of the targets, the differences between our periods and those periods of the other authors are less than 10%.…”
Section: Variability Analysissupporting
confidence: 48%
See 3 more Smart Citations