2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring systems sustainability with multi-criteria methods: A critical review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
149
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 260 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
5
149
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, in recent years a percentual increase in studies using MCDM techniques has been observed. This tendency has been seen in other studies reviewed on the employment of MCDM techniques in diverse spheres (Diaz-Balteiro and Romero, 2008;Diaz-Balteiro et al, 2017). However, unlike the work of Diaz-Balteiro and Romero (2008), the number of studies which can be included under the heading "harvest scheduling" or "extended harvest scheduling" is clearly on the rise.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Additionally, in recent years a percentual increase in studies using MCDM techniques has been observed. This tendency has been seen in other studies reviewed on the employment of MCDM techniques in diverse spheres (Diaz-Balteiro and Romero, 2008;Diaz-Balteiro et al, 2017). However, unlike the work of Diaz-Balteiro and Romero (2008), the number of studies which can be included under the heading "harvest scheduling" or "extended harvest scheduling" is clearly on the rise.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Unlike goal programming, the methodology based on the ideal point seeks to find a set of solutions, which are not necessarily restricted by parameters imposed by the researcher, but are the most suitable for the problem [33]. In distance-based methods, the idea of maximizing a utility function, as in classic optimization methods, is replaced by the minimization of the distance between an alternative and a target point enjoying better preferential characteristics [35]. Regardless of the methods used, it should be noted that these are only supporting tools, and their function is not to replace the role of researchers in any decision-making process [34].…”
Section: The Theory Of Ideal Point and The Compromise Programming Appmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies end up with outlining or quantifying indicators for predefined AoPs, with possible aggregation through multicriteria analysis (Vazquez‐Rowe and Iribarren ; Diaz‐Balteiro et al. ; Onat et al. ; Finkbeiner et al.…”
Section: Interconnectedness Among Areas Of Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a clear lack of understanding on the mutual dependencies and complex interactions among entities in the cause-effect chain (Onat et al 2016a;Zamagni et al 2013). Many studies end up with outlining or quantifying indicators for predefined AoPs, with possible aggregation through multicriteria analysis (Vazquez-Rowe and Iribarren 2015;Diaz-Balteiro et al 2017;Onat et al 2016b;Finkbeiner et al 2010;UNEP-SETAC 2011). These offer practical solutions, but do not take the next needed step of considering cause-effect pathways between AoPs.…”
Section: Interconnectedness Among Areas Of Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%