2009
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/692/2/1476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the Sources of the Intergalactic Ionizing Flux

Abstract: We use a wide-field (0.9 deg 2 ) X-ray sample with optical and GALEX ultraviolet observations to measure the contribution of Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs) to the ionizing flux as a function of redshift. Our analysis shows that the AGN contribution to the metagalactic ionizing background peaks at around z = 2. The measured values of the ionizing background from the AGNs are lower than previous estimates and confirm that ionization from AGNs is insufficient to maintain the observed ionization of the intergalacti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

17
181
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
17
181
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Resulting uncertainties in the specific emissivity are rarely discussed (see Faucher-Giguère et al 2008 for an exception), or limited to variations in the EUV spectral index ). Consequently, current estimates of the specific Lyman limit emissivity of quasars still vary by a factor ∼ 2 at z = 3-4 (Hopkins et al 2007;Siana et al 2008;Cowie et al 2009;Masters et al 2012). Figure 12 compares our stacked spectrum and various quasar composites to broken power-law parameterizations used to estimate the specific quasar Lyman limit emissivity and/or the quasar contribution to the UV background (Cowie et al 2009;Faucher-Giguère et al 2009;Haardt & Madau 2012).…”
Section: Quasar Emissivity and Photoionisation Ratementioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Resulting uncertainties in the specific emissivity are rarely discussed (see Faucher-Giguère et al 2008 for an exception), or limited to variations in the EUV spectral index ). Consequently, current estimates of the specific Lyman limit emissivity of quasars still vary by a factor ∼ 2 at z = 3-4 (Hopkins et al 2007;Siana et al 2008;Cowie et al 2009;Masters et al 2012). Figure 12 compares our stacked spectrum and various quasar composites to broken power-law parameterizations used to estimate the specific quasar Lyman limit emissivity and/or the quasar contribution to the UV background (Cowie et al 2009;Faucher-Giguère et al 2009;Haardt & Madau 2012).…”
Section: Quasar Emissivity and Photoionisation Ratementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Adopting our power-law fit fν ∝ ν −0.61 instead, we obtain Lyman limit flux ratios of f L14 ν,912 /f FG09 ν,912 = 1.12 ) and f L14 ν,912 /f HM12 ν,912 = 1.38 (Haardt & Madau 2012) as correction factors to the quasar Lyman limit emissivity ν,912(z) for a fixed luminosity function 13 . We point out that Cowie et al (2009) computed a power-law slope of -1.35 at 700 < λ < 2300Å obtained from GALEX photometry of a zem ∼ 1 AGN sample. This implies a 700Å to 2300Å flux ratio of 0.20.…”
Section: Quasar Emissivity and Photoionisation Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Probably the most significant sources varied over time. At late times, z < 3, it has been found that the bulk of the ionizing photons originates from quasars (Faucher-Giguère et al 2008) and AGNs (Cowie et al 2009), while at higher redshifts quasars are too few in number to be the dominant source (Jiang et al 2008;Loeb 2009). The onset of the reionization has instead been connected to the appearance of the first luminous structures in the universe, the first stars and galaxies (Haehnelt et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%