2019
DOI: 10.1080/00987913.2019.1611293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Usage: A Comprehensive Analysis of a Social Work Journal Collection

Abstract: This study examines what can be learned about a library's electronic social work journal collection from usage statistics, survey data, faculty publications and an examination of open access (OA) availability. A collections analysis was completed using data from two main sources: a custom collections report created by 1Science and results of a faculty survey on their top journal choices for teaching. After creating a list of journals important to the field of social work, top journals were identified by articl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…McKinnon and Tummon adopted a similar approach. They used the same McGill University 1Science and Canadian Research Knowledge Network (CRKN) Journal Usage Project (JUP) Faculty Survey reports used in this paper-as well as faculty publications lists-to analyse McGill's social work journal collection for faculty support and to identify potential gaps 10 . In their collection analysis, one finding was that "each tool and usage measurement provided a different set of 'top' journals with minimal overlap between them" 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McKinnon and Tummon adopted a similar approach. They used the same McGill University 1Science and Canadian Research Knowledge Network (CRKN) Journal Usage Project (JUP) Faculty Survey reports used in this paper-as well as faculty publications lists-to analyse McGill's social work journal collection for faculty support and to identify potential gaps 10 . In their collection analysis, one finding was that "each tool and usage measurement provided a different set of 'top' journals with minimal overlap between them" 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%