2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-007-0139-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical Bowel Preparation for Elective Colorectal Surgery with Primary Intraperitoneal Anastomosis by a Single Surgeon: Interim Analysis of a Prospective Single-Blinded Randomized Trial

Abstract: We report an interim analysis of a prospective single-blinded randomized trial designed to investigate whether preoperative mechanical bowel preparation influences the rate of surgical-site infection and anastomotic failure after elective colorectal surgery with primary intraperitoneal anastomosis performed by a single surgeon. Patients scheduled to undergo an elective colorectal procedure with a primary intraperitoneal anastomosis were randomized to receive either oral polyethylene glycol lavage solution and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach to the abdominal cavity was standardized as previously described. 17 Both ends of the intestinal segment were sectioned with staplers (GIA, Tyco Healthcare) to avoid the spillage of feces. Anastomoses were hand-sewn or stapled according to the preference of the surgeon.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach to the abdominal cavity was standardized as previously described. 17 Both ends of the intestinal segment were sectioned with staplers (GIA, Tyco Healthcare) to avoid the spillage of feces. Anastomoses were hand-sewn or stapled according to the preference of the surgeon.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26][27][28][29] Since then, several trials have been performed. [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] All studies are slightly different in their methodology, with some studies including patients who also underwent procedures in which intestinal continuity was not restored, and others including procedures in both the right and left colon. Anastomotic leak rates for all studies are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Initial Randomized Controlled Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] The overall analysis of the main outcome measures shows that no parameter reaches the statistical significance between MBP vs. non-MBP patients ( Table 1). The only exception is represented by the occurrence of cardiac events (acute myocardial infarctions, atrial fibrillations, heart failures, angina pectoris) that seem decreased in the non-MBP group ( Table 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%