1989
DOI: 10.1021/ma00191a074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical properties at the gel point of a crystallizing poly(vinyl chloride) solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
182
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 277 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
8
182
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the Winter-Chambon method the critical ageing time is 0.75 h [8]. This behaviour is in general shown for the development of physical and chemical networks.…”
Section: Examples A) Crystallisationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…According to the Winter-Chambon method the critical ageing time is 0.75 h [8]. This behaviour is in general shown for the development of physical and chemical networks.…”
Section: Examples A) Crystallisationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The definition of the gel point by this power-law is excellent because the gelation variable will lose its dependency of frequency at the gel point. Several works have shown that this method is reliable and valid for determination of the gel point for various polymer gels with different gelation mechanisms [30][31][32][33] . Figure 2(a) shows the application of the Winter-Chambon method to the solution of 2 wt.% alginate within the sol-gel transition region.…”
Section: Sol-gel Transitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characteristic time ratio at the gel point versus degree of undercooling for the four iPP samples (points). tc/tA was estimated with the use of experimental gel times tc from Figure 9 and Avrami times tA ) 2.66 × 10 6 e -0.224 ∆T from Kim et al 29 The solid line represents the fit by an empirical parabolic function tc/tA ) -0.809 + 0.127(∆T) -0.0036(∆T) 2 with a maximum at ∆T ) 17.6 K. Figure 15. Relative crystallinity at the gel point Xc/X∞ versus degree of undercooling for the four iPP samples (points).…”
Section: S(t) ) S(tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative crystallinity at the gel point Xc/X∞ versus degree of undercooling for the four iPP samples (points). Xc/ X∞ was estimated according to eqs 12, and 14 with the use of experimental gel times tc from Figure 9 and Avrami times tA ) 2.66 × 10 6 e -0.224 ∆T from Kim et al 29 The solid line represents the fit by an empirical parabolic function X c ) -0.087 + 0.012(∆T) -3.405 × 10 -4 (∆T) 2 with a maximum at the same undercooling ∆T ) 17.6 K.…”
Section: S(t) ) S(tmentioning
confidence: 99%