2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical, thermal, and physical properties of Mg–Ca compounds in the framework of the modified embedded-atom method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the literature, MgX potentials were proposed for solute elements of Al, Li, Sn, Ca, and Y using the MEAM framework (Kim et al, 2009;Kim et al, 2012;Groh, 2015;Kim et al, 2015) and for solute elements of Al and Li using the EAM formalism (Liu and Adams, 1998;Mendelev et al, 2009;Karewar et al, 2014). For each potential, the domain of application of the Mg-X pair is summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Mgx Semi-empirical Potentials In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From the literature, MgX potentials were proposed for solute elements of Al, Li, Sn, Ca, and Y using the MEAM framework (Kim et al, 2009;Kim et al, 2012;Groh, 2015;Kim et al, 2015) and for solute elements of Al and Li using the EAM formalism (Liu and Adams, 1998;Mendelev et al, 2009;Karewar et al, 2014). For each potential, the domain of application of the Mg-X pair is summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Mgx Semi-empirical Potentials In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each potential, the domain of application of the Mg-X pair is summarized in Table 1. While the magnesium MEAM potential of Kim et al (2009) was used as a starting point for Kim et al (2012), Kim et al (2015), and Groh (2015) to develop the cross-pair with Al, Li, Sn, Y, and Ca, the magnesium EAM of Sun et al (2006) was used as a starting point by Mendelev et al (2009) and Karewar et al (2014) to develop the cross-pair with Al and Li, respectively. For simplification, G-MEAM, K-MEAM, K-EAM, L-EAM, and M-EAM refer to the potentials proposed by Groh (2015), Kim et al (2009Kim et al ( , 2012Kim et al ( , 2015, Karewar et al (2014), Liu and Adams (1998), and Mendelev et al (2009), repectively.…”
Section: Mgx Semi-empirical Potentials In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since computing resource limits the use of first-principle method to system described by a limited number of atoms, atomistic methods in the framework of (semi)-empirical potential are helpful to model the energetic of systems with larger number of atoms. To reveal the effect of solute elements on the mechanical properties of magnesium (Zu and Groh 2016, Somekawa and Mukai 2013, Groh 2014, Bhatia et al 2015, Kim et al 2015a, Miyazawa et al 2015, Reddy and Groh 2016, Yi et al 2016 or to investigate the defect properties and behavior in ordered magnesium alloys (Xiao et al 2013), parameterization of interatomic potentials for binary systems Mg-X (X = Cu, Al, Si, Gd, Y, Sn, Ca, Fe, Li, Ag) were proposed in the EAM and MEAM frameworks (Liu and Adams 1998, Zhou et al 2004, Wu and Hu 2007, Kim et al 2009, 2015b, Mendelev et al 2009, Jelinek et al 2012, Pei et al 2013, Karewar et al 2014,Groh 2015.…”
Section: Interatomic Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miyazawa et al showed the effects of segregated Al on twinning mechanisms in Mg [10]. In addition, Reddy and Groh [11] analyzed the effect of segregated Ca on the yield surfaces of NC magnesium using a MgCa-MEAM potential [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%