2012
DOI: 10.1080/00038628.2012.664938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical ventilation in recently built Dutch homes: technical shortcomings, possibilities for improvement, perceived indoor environment and health effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, some of the individual MVHR and MEV usability issues highlighted here have also been picked up by another study of 299 homes in the Netherlands (Balvers et al 2012), demonstrating that these issues are of concern at an international level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…For example, some of the individual MVHR and MEV usability issues highlighted here have also been picked up by another study of 299 homes in the Netherlands (Balvers et al 2012), demonstrating that these issues are of concern at an international level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…(In any case, there is evidence to suggest MVHR systems may not necessarily improve indoor air quality due to ineffective use and poor maintenance. 27 ) It is also noteworthy that if energy sources are decarbonised over time, the CO 2 benefits of ventilation control will also diminish, as would benefits from the reduced ingress of outdoor pollution as outdoor PM 2.5 levels will also be lower. These factors will tend to reduce the benefits of lower permeability levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the same exhaust ducts can be used and the ducts to the incoming air are kept minimal as the incoming air can go straight trough the outer wall. The short duct system is beneficial since ducts often tend to be contaminated with dust and dirt [16]. This type of ventilation system is also suitable for buildings where cross contamination is extra sensitive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%