2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanics of ballistic impact with non-axisymmetric projectiles on thin aluminium targets. Part II: Energy considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is to be expected since a spherical projectile has a larger contact surface during the impact event than a conical projectile at the same impact velocity. Also, a conical projectile tends to cut through the plies, whereas a spherical projectile induces early delamination, resulting in comparatively higher damaged areas [49].…”
Section: Damage Area Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is to be expected since a spherical projectile has a larger contact surface during the impact event than a conical projectile at the same impact velocity. Also, a conical projectile tends to cut through the plies, whereas a spherical projectile induces early delamination, resulting in comparatively higher damaged areas [49].…”
Section: Damage Area Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be attributed to the fact that; the conical projectile impact has been performed at a comparatively greater velocity, and the contact area is lower for a conical projectile when compared with a spherical projectile. The residual velocity obtained from the numerical analysis considering the strain rate effect for all the test cases is represented in Figure 14 [49,50].…”
Section: Rate Dependence Effect On Residual Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%