2006
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.01372.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanistic basis of differences in Ca2+-handling properties of sarcoplasmic reticulum in right and left ventricles of normal rat myocardium

Abstract: transients, evoked by electrical field stimulation, were significantly prolonged in RV myocytes compared with LV myocytes, mainly because of slow decay of intracellular Ca 2ϩ concentration. The slow decay of intracellular Ca 2ϩ concentration in RV and consequent decrease in the speed of RV relaxation may promote temporal synchrony of the end of diastole in RV and LV. The preponderance of functionally silent SR Ca 2ϩ pumps in RV reflects a higher diastolic reserve required to protect and maintain RV function in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
29
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
5
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…28 SERCA2a and PLB mRNA levels were also similar in both ventricles in rats, 33 whereas protein expression of both was lower in RV. 26 In accordance, SR Ca 2+ sequestration was slower in RV compared with LV in normal rat myocardium, 38,26 There are few data available about chamber-specific Ca 2+ -handling properties in large mammals. RyR2 mRNA and protein expression were lower in RV compared with LV in myocardium of control dogs.…”
Section: Differences In Ca 2+ Handling and Contractilitymentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…28 SERCA2a and PLB mRNA levels were also similar in both ventricles in rats, 33 whereas protein expression of both was lower in RV. 26 In accordance, SR Ca 2+ sequestration was slower in RV compared with LV in normal rat myocardium, 38,26 There are few data available about chamber-specific Ca 2+ -handling properties in large mammals. RyR2 mRNA and protein expression were lower in RV compared with LV in myocardium of control dogs.…”
Section: Differences In Ca 2+ Handling and Contractilitymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…6 Potential ionic differences between basal LV and RV cellular electrophysiology have been identified at the mRNA, protein and functional levels (see Table 1). In most species and experimental models, the RV myocardium shows a relative overexpression of K v 4.2, K v 4.3 and KChIP2, 23,24 molecular components of I to , as well as greater KCNQ1 expression, 25,26 part of the I Ks macromolecular complex. In agreement, a number of studies observed larger I Ks and I to in RV compared with LV.…”
Section: Differences In Ion Channel Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, it was believed that differences in global structure and loading conditions represented the main differences between the right and left ventricles. However, recent work has shown an increasing divergence in the anterior and primary heart field pathways leading to the differentiation of RV versus LV cardiomyocytes during early development (46) and chamber-specific differences in cell signaling and calcium handling, suggesting fundamental differences between the right and left ventricles at the cellular level as well (10,32,34,54,72). Recent studies suggest that standard pharmacotherapies used to treat LV dysfunction may not be as effective in patients with dysfunction of a systemic right ventricle (18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SR membrane vesicles were isolated from ASM according to previously described procedures (18,53). Briefly, the smooth muscle layer from fresh porcine trachea was minced well on ice and suspended in ice-cold 10 mM NaHCO 3 buffer (pH 6.8) prepared in Ca 2ϩ -free water, 20 g/l leupeptin, and 100 g/l trypsin inhibitor.…”
Section: Preparation Of Sr Membrane Vesiclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values were calculated as percent inhibition at each time point. The protein content of each aliquot was then determined to further normalize the actual 45 Ca 2ϩ uptake in nanomoles per milligram of protein (18,53,67).…”
Section: Determination Of Ca 2ϩ Uptakementioning
confidence: 99%