2014
DOI: 10.31285/agro.18.469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

¿Medir el pH del suelo en la mezcla suelo: agua en reposo o agitando?

Abstract: En la determinación del pH en suelo hay que considerar el tiempo de lectura y si realizar las medidas en reposo o agitando la mezcla suelo:agua . Este estudio comparó la medición de pH en el sobrenadante de la mezcla suelo:agua (1:2,5) luego de 15 minutos de reposo, con la alternativa de medir durante la agitación y en menor tiempo. Los procedimientos de medición de pH fueron: i) 3 minutos de agitación + 15 minutos de reposo y medición en el sobrenadante sin agitar (protocolo del laboratorio de INIA La Estanzu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To obtain the mineralogical analyses two methods were used: (i) quantitative evaluation of minerals by scanning electron microscopy (QEMSCAN) analysis using TIMA technology; (ii) Bulk Mineralogical Analysis (BMA) method to identify the modal mineralogical composition with the occurrence of Cu, Fe, and S ( Table 3 ). Finally, soil pH was determined according to the protocol described by Beretta et al (2014) . Subsequently, and prior to the tests, the tailings samples were sieved at 2 mm and then quartered to obtain 5 kg of sample for all the tests carried out in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain the mineralogical analyses two methods were used: (i) quantitative evaluation of minerals by scanning electron microscopy (QEMSCAN) analysis using TIMA technology; (ii) Bulk Mineralogical Analysis (BMA) method to identify the modal mineralogical composition with the occurrence of Cu, Fe, and S ( Table 3 ). Finally, soil pH was determined according to the protocol described by Beretta et al (2014) . Subsequently, and prior to the tests, the tailings samples were sieved at 2 mm and then quartered to obtain 5 kg of sample for all the tests carried out in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of the key soil parameters for the different PaCrR at the beginning of the present period of evaluation are given in Table 2. Soil analyses were carried out in Soil, Plant and Water Laboratory of INIA La Estanzuela (Colonia, Uruguay) and pH was estimated according to Beretta et al [38], %C was estimated according to Wright et al [39], %N was estimated from combustion at 900 • and detection of N 2 , through thermal conductivity according to Simmone et al [40], P (ppm) was estimated according to Bray and Kurtz [41] and bases were estimated according to Jackson [42]. Differences in soil parameters can be attributed to carry over effects over time as CC, SR and LR started in 1995 and FR started in 2013.…”
Section: Description Of the Pasture-crop Rotationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Luego se procedió a su tamizado y colocación de 10g en tubos falcon de 50 ml, a los que se les agregó 25 ml de agua desionizada (o destilada). La mezcla de suelo-agua se agitó durante 3 minutos y se dejó reposar otros 3 minutos, para luego llevar la medición en el sobrenadante (Beretta et al, 2014).…”
Section: Ph Y Anegabilidadunclassified