Membrane defouling using microbubbles generated by fluidic oscillation

Abstract

Impurities and colloidal substances are two of many fouling conditions that reduce the membrane filtration performance used in wastewater treatment. This study investigates the potential of fluidic-oscillation-generated microbubbles (MBs) to defoul the filtration membrane. Cartridge filters for microfiltration (MF) of 1 μm pore size were fouled using surface seawater collected from the Hull coastal area. The seawater was circulated at 5.8 L/min to actuate colloidal substance deposition on the membrane surface. The recorded feed channel pressure drop (ΔP) across the membrane filters showed rapid fouling occurred in the first 8 hrs of the circulation. Fluctuations of ΔP during the next 8 hrs were observed showing the colloids filling the pores of the membrane, and remaining steady for 2 hrs showing the membrane was completely fouled. The filtration membrane was cleaned and defouled using fluidic-oscillator-generated MBs. The fouled membranes were sparged with 1 L/min of air scouring for ∼1 to ∼2 hrs to remove the deposited colloids and impurities on the surface of the membrane. The membrane, analysed by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), UV254 and Electrical Conductivity (EC) meter, showed the extent of MBs-mediated removal of the deposited colloidal particle from the membrane surfaces. This study found that the highest defouling rate occurs with MBs generated by fluidic oscillator (closed vent), followed by MBs generated by fluidic oscillator (opened vent) and MBs generated without fluidic oscillator at 9.53, 6.22, and 3.41 mbar/min, respectively.

Microbubble-Assisted Cleaning To Enhance the Removal of Milk Deposits from the Heat Transfer Surface

“…According to the results of CFD simulations (Table 3), all the MBs injected into the SDA theoretically can contact the deposit surface at the three Re levels tested. Therefore, the larger enhancement in deposit removal by MBs observed at higher Re could be because of the increased momentum transfer on the deposit surface generated by bubble scrubbing, 42 which needs to be accurately quantified by further numerical simulations. In addition, high-speed highresolution imaging of the MB−deposit interface during cleaning can help reveal the deposit removal mechanism more clearly.…”

Rapid-Slow Sand Filtration for Groundwater Treatment: Effect of Filtration Velocity and Initial Head Loss

“…This transport phenomenon between the two-phase fluids will promote the removal of dissolved metals from the solution through the chemical combination. C. Harun and Zimmerman [15] discussed the benefits of smaller bubble for a better mass and energy transfer in the water. They present a series of data on how the bubbles scrubbing out the biofilm layer on the surface of membrane filtration which caused by the turbulence of aeration.…”

“…Aeration, where it mainly for oxidation purpose, depends largely on the amount of surface contact between air and bubbles. The smaller the size of bubbles, the higher the surface contact area between air and bubbles [15].…”

Influence of diffuser design on selected operating variables for wastewater flotation systems: a review

“…Organic matter can also contribute to the deposition of biopolymers (Odize et al 2017) and inorganics can lead to the deposition of different cationic and anionic precipitates of chemical or biological nature which could further exacerbate the fouling challenges (Wang et al 2008). Additionally, biofouling is a result of deposition of small particles onto the diffusers leading to the formation of a cake layer which is composed of particles built-up; thereby, leading to flow resistance, thus loss of bubble generation efficiency (Harun & Zimmerman 2019). This leads to an increase of back pressure on the air pump or compressor (Rosso & Shaw 2015), resulting in decreased aeration efficiency.…”