2017 27th International Symposium on Power and Timing Modeling, Optimization and Simulation (PATMOS) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/patmos.2017.8106959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memristive logic: A framework for evaluation and comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter is considered a requirement for real in-/near-memory computing, since the topology of the logic circuits to implement should fit in the crossbar memory array, which is most likely the prevailing topology for memristive memory. What is more, the metrics proposed so far for the comparison of such logic families naturally focus on latency, energy, and area efficiency [20]. However, most such relevant works omit crucial factors such as variability (both cycle-to-cycle and device-to-device) and endurance of memristors; being the latter a major limitation to be considered if frequent switching is necessary during computations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is considered a requirement for real in-/near-memory computing, since the topology of the logic circuits to implement should fit in the crossbar memory array, which is most likely the prevailing topology for memristive memory. What is more, the metrics proposed so far for the comparison of such logic families naturally focus on latency, energy, and area efficiency [20]. However, most such relevant works omit crucial factors such as variability (both cycle-to-cycle and device-to-device) and endurance of memristors; being the latter a major limitation to be considered if frequent switching is necessary during computations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In-memory evaluation of bitwise logic operations has been explored for memristive memories [48]- [50] and DRAM [51]. Our work differs from these efforts in several important aspects.…”
Section: Fig 1: Related Work: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emergence of the RRAM as a NVM device which can compute, at a time when computer architects are facing the memory wall problem, has set the stage for RRAM to be efficiently deployed for in-memory computing. A new field called 'memristive logic' [1] has emerged, which is the methodology of designing logic circuits using RRAM as the primary computing device. Consequently, research in RRAM-based memories [2] and RRAM-based computing circuits [3] are very active and ever increasing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%