1998
DOI: 10.1108/02610159810785467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Men, women and the use of power: is it based on the person or the situation?

Abstract: If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, and most encouraging, is that this learning may finally steer research away from male versus female issues to effective versus ineffective issues:``These findings support the conclusion that leadership style/ use of power is more of a choice based on an analysis of the situation than an inherent gender predisposition and that leadership style differences, if any, may blur as gendermixed management teams become more common in the workplace'' (Langford et al, 1998).…”
Section: Attitudinal Driversmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Third, and most encouraging, is that this learning may finally steer research away from male versus female issues to effective versus ineffective issues:``These findings support the conclusion that leadership style/ use of power is more of a choice based on an analysis of the situation than an inherent gender predisposition and that leadership style differences, if any, may blur as gendermixed management teams become more common in the workplace'' (Langford et al, 1998).…”
Section: Attitudinal Driversmentioning
confidence: 83%