Mercury Ions Removal from Aqueous Solution Using an Activated Composite Membrane

Abstract

This work presents the results concerning the first use of activated composite membranes (ACMs) for the removal of Hg(II) ions from aqueous solution, using as the ligand di-(2-ethylhexyl)dithiophosphoric acid (DTPA). The effects on the removal percentage of Hg(ll) of variables such as pH, the nature of the acid, the concentration of mercury (in the feed solutions), and the ligand content (in the membrane) as well as the total surface membrane area exposed to the Hg(II) aqueous solution were studied. During the course of the removal experiments, the membrane was immersed in the Hg(II) aqueous solution in acid media and samples of the solution were taken at different times to enable monitoring of the mercury concentration changes. Itwasfound that when the ACM was prepared with a 1.0 M DTPA casting solution and the feed solution contained 2.49 x 10(-4) M Hg(II) in HCI 0.1 M the amount of mercury extracted was higher than 93%. Straight forwardly, additional experiments were carried out with the free-DTPA composite membranes to make up a set of control reference points to verify that removal of the investigated heavy metal was a consequence of the presence of the organic ligand; otherwise there was no Hg(II) concentration variation at all.

Highly effective removal of Cu(II) by triethylenetetramine-magnetic reduced graphene oxide composite

“…Therefore, Cu(II) ions must be removed from wastewater before it is released into the environment. Various techniques have been developed to remove Cu(II) from contaminated media, including precipitation [6,7], membrane filtration [8,9], and ion exchange [10]. However, these techniques may be costly or time-consuming.…”

Highly effective removal of heavy metals by polymer-based zirconium phosphate: A case study of lead ion

“…On the other hand, various efficient technologies, including chemical precipitation [2], adsorption onto activated carbon [3], membrane processes [4], electrolytic methods [5], and ion exchange [6][7][8],…”

Removal of Heavy Metals from Wastewater using Date Palm as a Biosorbent: A Comparative Review

“…Several advanced techniques exist for the reduction of the environmental impact of industrial wastewater containing heavy metal ions, such as reverse osmosis (Gupta et al 2012), advanced oxidation (Oller et al 2011), ion exchange (Da̧browski et al 2004), solvent extraction (Hall et al 1990), membrane filtration processes (Blöcher et al 2003;Mavrov et al 2006;Paez-Hernandez et al 2005), GAC/O 3 oxidation (Qian (Zhang et al 2012), lime softening (Varga et al 2013), coagulation/flocculation (Amuda et al 2006), electrochemical processes (Ahmad et al 2012), electrocoagulation (Balasubramanian et al 2009;Ratna Kumar et al 2004), chitosan graphene oxide nanocomposites (Shahzad et al 2017) and chemical precipitation (Rathinam et al 2010). These treatment methods have some limitations, which include highenergy requirements, production of oxidation by-products, regeneration requirements during ion exchange, bulk toxic sludge generation in flocculation/coagulation methods, short half-life in ozonation and membrane fouling during the filtration process.…”