2011
DOI: 10.5334/jbr-btr.659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesenteric panniculitis part 2: prevalence and natural course: mdct prospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
125
4
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
11
125
4
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the diagnostic criteria of Coulier [5], "sign 2" and "sign 3" were present in the whole study population. Twenty-four patients (66%) had a mass effect (sign 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the diagnostic criteria of Coulier [5], "sign 2" and "sign 3" were present in the whole study population. Twenty-four patients (66%) had a mass effect (sign 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to confirm the presence of radiologic characteristic features of MP. The radiologic diagnosis of MP was defined according to the study of Coulier [5], which defined 5 typical CT signs: (i) the presence of a well-defined "mass effect" on neighboring structures, (ii) constituted by mesenteric fat tissue of an inhomogeneous higher attenuation than adjacent retroperitoneal or mesocolonic fat, (iii) containing small soft tissue nodes, (iv) a fatty "halo sign" indicating the preservation of a halo of fat around the involved vessels; and (v) a hyper-attenuating pseudocapsule. The diagnosis of MP was established if 3 of these signs were present (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The radiological CT diagnosis of MP is classically based on typical if not pathognomonic features clearly described and documented in the literature (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). They comprise the presence of a well-defined "mass effect" on neighboring structures (sign 1) constituted by mesenteric fat tissue of inhomogeneous higher attenuation than adjacent retro peritoneal or mesocolonic fat (sign 2) and containing small soft tissue nodules (sign 3).…”
Section: Dear Editor In Chiefmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent couple of papers published in volume 94 (2011) of JBR-BTR we successively tried to explore the typical imaging findings and to prospectively study the prevalence and natural course of MP (1,2).…”
Section: Dear Editor In Chiefmentioning
confidence: 99%