Mesopic visual efficiency III: Discrimination threshold measurements

Abstract

The authors represent a research consortium which has adopted a task performance based approach for nighttime driving to obtain mesopic spectral sensitivity functions. This study describes investigations based on discrimination threshold techniques and compares the results with those obtained from detection threshold measurements. It forms a continuation of `Mesopic models — from brightness matching to visual performance in night-time driving: a review'. 1 The achromatic increment contrast threshold for discrimination of a quasi-static target represents the ability to correctly identify a target which has low contrast with the background and is therefore a highly relevant visual task in the context of nighttime driving. The psychophysical experiments reported here are carried out in the laboratory and in dynamic nighttime driving tests. The spectral sensitivity functions resulting from the discrimination threshold contrast investigations show a significant contribution from the colour-opponent (or chromatic) channels of the visual system. Similar features have been observed in results from investigations using detection threshold techniques.

Road lighting research for drivers and pedestrians: The basis of luminance and illuminance recommendations

“…54 The mesopic system was derived from two parallel bodies of work, the European MOVE consortium [55][56][57][58] who used and driving on a test track. 62 The mesopic visual response is essentially a weighed combination of the scotopic (S) and photopic (P) responses, and hence the CIE mesopic system 53 provides the weighting factor according to the level of adaptation and the S/P ratio of lighting, this being established by consensus between the two bodies of work.…”

Proposed UK guidance for lighting in residential roads

“…higher rod stimulation) providing improved detection probability and reaction time. 30,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38] In a recent study, a novel apparatus was built with which to measure detection of pavement obstacles under different light sources and illuminances. 9 The results confirmed that obstacle detection increased with increasing illuminance and with higher S/P ratio ( Figure 3).…”

The effect of assuming static or dynamic gaze behaviour on the estimated background luminance of drivers

“…The 20° size was chosen because the experiments contributing to CIE 191 1 used a 10° offaxis target which falls at the perimeter of this schematic. [11][12][13] We first assumed the whole of this field to be relevant, but also investigated the effect of ignoring the upper part of the field assumed to be less critical for drivers.…”