2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12551-012-0074-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesoscopic analysis of motion and conformation of cross-bridges

Abstract: The orientation of a cross-bridge is widely used as a parameter in determining the state of muscle. The conventional measurements of orientation, such as that made by wide-field fluorescence microscopy, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) or X-ray diffraction or scattering, report the average orientation of 10 12 -10 9 myosin cross-bridges. Under conditions where all the cross-bridges are immobile and assume the same orientation, for example in normal skeletal muscle in rigor, it is possible to determine the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FRET is the principal method of choice for studying dynamic protein-protein interactions because it extends the resolution limitation of confocal microscopy (∼250 nm) to ∼10 nm and serves as a widely accepted tool for estimating the proximity of macromolecules in living cells (32). To avoid inhomogeneities between samples, we carried out FRET imaging on single cells in a mesoscopic regime as described previously by Midde and colleagues (33,34). To determine when and where GIV binds EGFR, Cos7 cells expressing the FRET probe pairs EGFR-YFP (35) and CFP-GIV-CT (at levels ∼1.5-twofold above endogenous GIV) were used ( Fig.…”
Section: Growth Factors Trigger Interactions Of Giv-ct Biosensors Witmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FRET is the principal method of choice for studying dynamic protein-protein interactions because it extends the resolution limitation of confocal microscopy (∼250 nm) to ∼10 nm and serves as a widely accepted tool for estimating the proximity of macromolecules in living cells (32). To avoid inhomogeneities between samples, we carried out FRET imaging on single cells in a mesoscopic regime as described previously by Midde and colleagues (33,34). To determine when and where GIV binds EGFR, Cos7 cells expressing the FRET probe pairs EGFR-YFP (35) and CFP-GIV-CT (at levels ∼1.5-twofold above endogenous GIV) were used ( Fig.…”
Section: Growth Factors Trigger Interactions Of Giv-ct Biosensors Witmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a more accurate method than fluorescence intensity correlation spectroscopy used earlier (40). The method separates autocorrelation functions of components with different lifetimes, and is thus able to reject contributions from scattered light and from after-pulsing ( fluorescence (I total ϭ I ʈ ϩ 2 ϫ I Ќ ) from one molecule of SeTau at 0.2 W laser power was 225 counts/s.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial slope (during the first min of incubation) of phosphate/time curve had a slope of 34.7 and 16.6 M P i /min/M head for phosphorylated and dephosphorylated myofibrils, respectively. Myosin LC1-The procedure for making LC1 was the same as previously described (40). Briefly, a pQE60 vector containing recombinant LC1 with a single cysteine residue (Cys-178) was donated by Dr. Susan Lowey (University of Vermont).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, previously validated internally tagged G α i 1 -YFP and CFP-G β 1 FRET probe pairs were used 114,115 . All fluorescence microscopy assays were performed on single cells in mesoscopic regime to avoid inhomogeneities from samples as shown previously by Midde et al 128,129 . Briefly, cells were sparsely split into sterile 35 mm MatTek glass bottom dishes and transfected with 1 μg of indicated constructs.…”
Section: Detailed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%