Metadata Extraction from Conference Proceedings Using Template-Based Approach

Dijital Kütüphanelerde Dokümanlardan Bilgi Geri Kazanımı için Kullanılan Güncel Teknolojiler: Derleme Çalışması

“…Eğer üst verisi çıkarılacak olan dokümanın şablonu bilinen bir şablona benziyorsa, üst veri çıkarımı için o şablonun kuralları kullanılır; değilse yeni gelen dokümanın şablonu çıkarılır, kuralları yazılır ve bu yeni şablon bilindik şablonlara eklenir. Bu tür sistemlere [13,14] örnek olarak verilebilir.…”

Semantic Publishing Challenge – Assessing the Quality of Scientific Output by Information Extraction and Interlinking

“…Table 2), but their performance has improved (cf. 9 , but will now also evaluate Milicka's/Burget's tool. Its reliance on the layout (which hardly ever changes) rather than the underlying markup (which improves every few years) promises low maintenance costs.…”

“…Kovriguina et al [9] presented a simple but efficient architecture, implemented in Python and sharing code with their Task 1 submission [8]. Their approach is mainly based on templates and regular expressions and relies on some external services for improving the quality of the results (e.g., DBLP for checking authors and citations).…”

“…Table 5 summarises the results of the performance evaluation. [12] 0.274 0.251 0.257 Sateli/Witte [15] 0.3 0.252 0.247 Kovriguina et al [9] 0.289 0.3 0.265 Ronzano et al [14] 0.316 0.401 0.332…”

“…Task 2 was designed to test the ability to extract data from the full text of the papers. It follows last year's Task 2, which focused on extracting information9 Licensing issues slowed down progress: from Vol-1265 the metadata are open under CC0, whereas for older volumes CEUR-WS.org does not have the editors' explicit permission to republish derivatives such as extracted RDF. Opinions diverge on the copyrightability of metadata[3]; DBLP actually republishes CEUR-WS.org metadata under ODC-BY.…”