1999
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.213.2.r99nv46530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Mediastinal Staging in the 1990s—Meta-analytic Comparison Of PET and CT

Abstract: PET is superior to CT for mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer, independent of performance index or clinical context of PET imaging.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
246
2
22

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 602 publications
(280 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
10
246
2
22
Order By: Relevance
“…In a meta-analysis for mediastinal lymph node staging, the mean sensitivity and specificity were 85 and 95% for PET (accuracy = 92%) and 61 and 79% for CT (accuracy = 75%), respectively. The log odds ratios were 3.77 ± 0.51 for PET and 1.79 ± 0.15 for CT (p \ 0.001) [9]. The diagnostic ability of PET was similar in another meta-analysis in which the sensitivity and specificity were 88 and 92% for PET (accuracy = 91%) and 65 and 76% for CT (accuracy = 73%), respectively [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a meta-analysis for mediastinal lymph node staging, the mean sensitivity and specificity were 85 and 95% for PET (accuracy = 92%) and 61 and 79% for CT (accuracy = 75%), respectively. The log odds ratios were 3.77 ± 0.51 for PET and 1.79 ± 0.15 for CT (p \ 0.001) [9]. The diagnostic ability of PET was similar in another meta-analysis in which the sensitivity and specificity were 88 and 92% for PET (accuracy = 91%) and 65 and 76% for CT (accuracy = 73%), respectively [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Both PET and integrated PET/CT have shown higher accuracy in lymph node staging of lung cancer than conventional CT [5,[9][10][11][12][13]. However, 18 F-FDG is not tumor-specific, therefore, it can be taken up by various physiologic changes or benign pathologic lesions [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PET is more accurate than CT in the detection or exclusion of mediastinal nodal metastases: sensitivities are 67-100% and 50-63% respectively whilst specificities are 81-100% and 59-94% [62][63][64][65]. PET has been shown to correctly increase or decrease nodal staging as initially determined by CT in 21% of presurgical patients [66].…”
Section: Positron Emission Tomographymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…PET/CT should be used for RT planning in NSCLC because it more accurately images tumor extent than CT alone [73], This is proven by a large surgical literature on the accuracy of FDG-PET in the lymph node staging of NSCLC [10,68,74,75].…”
Section: Tumor Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%