2017
DOI: 10.5194/tc-11-2439-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methanesulfonic acid (MSA) migration in polar ice: data synthesis and theory

Abstract: Abstract. Methanesulfonic acid (MSA; CH 3 SO 3 H) in polar ice is a unique proxy of marine primary productivity, synoptic atmospheric transport, and regional sea-ice behavior. However, MSA can be mobile within the firn and ice matrix, a post-depositional process that is well known but poorly understood and documented, leading to uncertainties in the integrity of the MSA paleoclimatic signal. Here, we use a compilation of 22 ice core MSA records from Greenland and Antarctica and a model of soluble impurity tran… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Wagnon et al (), this results from an increase in the Cl − concentration toward the surface which can be explained by HCl mobility in snow. Gas migration in polar ice has also been evidenced for other elements, such as nitric acid (HNO 3 , Mayewski & Legrand, ), or methanesulfonic acid (Osman et al, ). Both the HCl migrating from the deeper part of the snow pit and the newly deposited chlorine will thus accumulate within the upper meters (Figure b, blue line).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…According to Wagnon et al (), this results from an increase in the Cl − concentration toward the surface which can be explained by HCl mobility in snow. Gas migration in polar ice has also been evidenced for other elements, such as nitric acid (HNO 3 , Mayewski & Legrand, ), or methanesulfonic acid (Osman et al, ). Both the HCl migrating from the deeper part of the snow pit and the newly deposited chlorine will thus accumulate within the upper meters (Figure b, blue line).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the GRIP runs, we use the depth-age scale t (z) and velocity w(z) from a Dansgaard-Johnsen model with the ice thickness H = 3029 m, the kink at 1000 m above the bed, and surface accumulation rate a = 0.23 m yr −1 ice equivalent. In the EPICA runs, we use t (z) and w(z) from the model w (Ritz, 1992) with H = 3275 m, n = 1.7, a = 0.023 m yr −1 , and the basal melt rate m base = 0.0008 m yr −1 , which yields a depth-age scale approximating the one published by Parrenin et al (2007). Smoothed versions of T (z) and d g (z) measured at the ice-core sites are used (Fig.…”
Section: Materials Reference Frame and Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A potentially more precise age estimate of the base of the SGC can be provided by matching the depth at which MSA disappears to the climate conditions likely to be responsible for the loss of MSA at 6.48 m depth. While a variety of factors can lead to MSA mobility in ice cores (Osman et al, 2017), the movement of liquid water is the most likely cause of MSA loss in this case (Moore et al, 2005; Supplementary material). The presence of liquid water in the snow pack is most likely during snow pack melt during warm temperatures.…”
Section: South Georgia Core Chronologymentioning
confidence: 99%