1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf00027428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method for biological quality assessment of watercourses in Belgium

Abstract: A description is given of the method generally used in Belgium to assess the quality of running water. It involves the determination of a biotic index with scores between 0 and 10

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
147
0
27

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 299 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
147
0
27
Order By: Relevance
“…The studies which enable biotic index definition deal mostly with the macrozoobenthic community structure over a long time period to determine the dynamics of physicochemical parameters and their influence on freshwater biota (Fleituch et al, 2002;Fleituch, 2003;Buffagni et al, 2004;Munné & Prat, 2004;Artemiadou & Lazaridou, 2005;Gabriels et al, 2005). In Belgium there is the Belgian Biotic Index (De Pauw & Vanhooren, 1983), in Denmark the Saprobity Index (Pantle & Buck, 1955), in France the Global Biotic Index or IBGN (AFNOR, 1992); in Germany the Saprobity Index (Knöpp, 1954;Pantle & Buck, 1955); in Ireland the Quality Rating System (Flanagan & Toner, 1972); in Italy the Extended Biotic Index (IBE) (Ghetti, 2001); in Luxembourg the Biotic Index (Verneaux & Tuffery, 1968); in the Netherland the Quality Index (K135) (Tolkamp & Gardeniers, 1988); in Spain the modified Biological Monitoring Working Party (B.M.W.P.) (Alba -Tercedor & Sanchez -Ortega, 1988) and in Great Britain the Average Score Per Taxon (ASPT) and B.M.W.P.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies which enable biotic index definition deal mostly with the macrozoobenthic community structure over a long time period to determine the dynamics of physicochemical parameters and their influence on freshwater biota (Fleituch et al, 2002;Fleituch, 2003;Buffagni et al, 2004;Munné & Prat, 2004;Artemiadou & Lazaridou, 2005;Gabriels et al, 2005). In Belgium there is the Belgian Biotic Index (De Pauw & Vanhooren, 1983), in Denmark the Saprobity Index (Pantle & Buck, 1955), in France the Global Biotic Index or IBGN (AFNOR, 1992); in Germany the Saprobity Index (Knöpp, 1954;Pantle & Buck, 1955); in Ireland the Quality Rating System (Flanagan & Toner, 1972); in Italy the Extended Biotic Index (IBE) (Ghetti, 2001); in Luxembourg the Biotic Index (Verneaux & Tuffery, 1968); in the Netherland the Quality Index (K135) (Tolkamp & Gardeniers, 1988); in Spain the modified Biological Monitoring Working Party (B.M.W.P.) (Alba -Tercedor & Sanchez -Ortega, 1988) and in Great Britain the Average Score Per Taxon (ASPT) and B.M.W.P.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The site selection was based on a maximal variation in natural and anthropogenic characteristics. Biological sampling consisted of collecting macroinvertebrates using a standard handnet during 5 min kick-sampling over a river stretch of 10 m (IBN 1984), thereby exploring in a representative way the different habitats present (De Pauw and Vanhooren 1983). This approach can also be described as a multihabitat sampling (Barbour et al 1999).…”
Section: Study Area and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a number of environmental variables and habitat characteristics were measured (Table 1). Macroinvertebrate samples were identified up to group, family or genus level as defined by De Pauw and Vanhooren (1983).…”
Section: Study Area and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The objective of the sampling consists of collecting the most representative diversity of macroinvertebrates at the station examined. The sampling effort covered a 10-min sampling time, exploring all accessible aquatic habitats or microbiotopes [15]. The assessment of the water quality was based on the BBI.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%