2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2003.00789.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method for the determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) by broth dilution of fermentative yeasts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
112
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
112
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When the MRL and submitting laboratory identifications differed, final identification by the MRL was used for the purpose of this analysis. MICs of amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, caspofungin, fluconazole, and 5-flucytosine were determined by the EUCAST broth microdilution method (30). Isolates were classified as susceptible or as showing decreased susceptibility.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the MRL and submitting laboratory identifications differed, final identification by the MRL was used for the purpose of this analysis. MICs of amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, caspofungin, fluconazole, and 5-flucytosine were determined by the EUCAST broth microdilution method (30). Isolates were classified as susceptible or as showing decreased susceptibility.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, treatment was switched to amphotericin B (3 mg/kg of body weight/day) for 3 weeks after antifungal drug susceptibility testing results (ATBFungus3; bioMerieux) showed decreased susceptibility to all of the antifungals tested, except amphotericin B. MICs of amphotericin B (0.5 g/ml), flucytosine (8 g/ml), fluconazole (64 g/ml), voriconazole (2 g/ml), posaconazole (0.5 g/ml), and caspofungin (Ͼ8 g/ml) were determined according to the EUCAST microdilution broth reference method (28). The inflammatory markers then returned to normal levels.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectrophotometric approach to antifungal susceptibility testing has indeed been shown to be valid and feasible for use in the clinical laboratory (9)(10)(11) and is an integral component of the European Committee on Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing BMD method (8,39). Until recently, spectrophotometry has not been incorporated into any commercially available testing method, leaving laboratories to contend with a nonautomated approach to antifungal susceptibility testing that is considered by many to be difficult and tedious to perform (25,34).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%