2018
DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201817001126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodical bases for forming the structure of management of innovative activity of large building holdings

Abstract: Abstract. The article considers the features of innovative activity from the standpoint of ensuring sustainable development of the construction industry, presents the features of construction that determine the objective need for innovation and the reasons for the industry's inertia towards innovations that hamper the process of transition to an innovative development path. The role of large enterprises as participants in the implementation of investment projects contributing to their most effective implementa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In scientific works, attempts were repeatedly made to systematize the parties of innovation activity from the standpoint of identifying similar features and functions in the innovation process, the role played, and the innovation potential. [1][2][3][4][5] Among the common disadvantages of the proposed classifications, it is possible to identify an excessive level of detail, based on the insignificant differentiation of subjects, and, conversely, too broad consideration of subjects that do not allow obtaining sufficiently accurate and reliable results. Besides, insufficient attention is paid to participation of holding companies in innovation activities, which is of particular importance, since large business, as a rule, is recognized as one of the most innovatively active market participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In scientific works, attempts were repeatedly made to systematize the parties of innovation activity from the standpoint of identifying similar features and functions in the innovation process, the role played, and the innovation potential. [1][2][3][4][5] Among the common disadvantages of the proposed classifications, it is possible to identify an excessive level of detail, based on the insignificant differentiation of subjects, and, conversely, too broad consideration of subjects that do not allow obtaining sufficiently accurate and reliable results. Besides, insufficient attention is paid to participation of holding companies in innovation activities, which is of particular importance, since large business, as a rule, is recognized as one of the most innovatively active market participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%