DOI: 10.4995/thesis/10251/14572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodological Integration of Communication Analysis Into a Model-Driven Software Development Framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 174 publications
(268 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we use the MMQEF method to evaluate the integration of two previous modelling methods that were generated from (and also supported by) the PROS Research Centre: the OO-Method (Pastor and Molina, 2007;Pastor et al, 2013), and the Communicational Analysis (CA) method (España et al, 2009;España Cubillo, 2012). The OO-Method is a model-driven, object-oriented software development method that generates complete applications from conceptual models.…”
Section: Quality Analysis Of the Oo-methods And Ca Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section, we use the MMQEF method to evaluate the integration of two previous modelling methods that were generated from (and also supported by) the PROS Research Centre: the OO-Method (Pastor and Molina, 2007;Pastor et al, 2013), and the Communicational Analysis (CA) method (España et al, 2009;España Cubillo, 2012). The OO-Method is a model-driven, object-oriented software development method that generates complete applications from conceptual models.…”
Section: Quality Analysis Of the Oo-methods And Ca Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another feature that supports our analysis of the OO-Method and CA methodological integration is the evidence of previous reports where both methods were analyzed independently with the reference taxonomy. The resulting analyses were reported in (de la Vara et al, 2007) (for OO-Method) and (España Cubillo, 2012) (for CA). Taking into account these two analyses, we use each independent analysis to overlap them and derive crosses in the cells of the reference taxonomy with the diagrams of both modelling approaches.…”
Section: Quality Analysis Of the Oo-methods And Ca Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides including stakeholders from different domains, MDA-based initiatives also help to include information from different organisational levels and preserve their alignment. MDA-based initiatives have pioneered the connection of business goals with business processes (Barat et al 2017;Guizzardi and Reis 2015;Amyot et al 2022), that can then be transformed into the conceptual schema of the information system (España 2011) and then into the code of the information system (Pastor and Molina 2007). However, recent approaches to software development (Evans and Evans 2004;Zimmermann 2017) and for scaling agile delivery of software products in digital enterprises (Mendling et al 2019;Forsgren et al 2018), put specific attention on knowledge about business strategy and organisational structure knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting analyses were reported in (de la Vara et al, 2007) (for OO-Method) and (España Cubillo, 2012) (for CA).…”
Section: Quality Analysis Of the Oo-methods And Ca Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we use the MMQEF method to evaluate the integration of two previous modelling methods that were generated from (and also supported by) the PROS Research Centre: the OO-Method (Pastor and Molina, 2007;Pastor et al, 2013), and the Communicational Analysis (CA) method (España et al, 2009;España Cubillo, 2012).…”
Section: Quality Analysis Of the Oo-methods And Ca Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%