2018
DOI: 10.9788/tp2018.3-11en
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodological Strategies for Resilience Research in Lesbians, Gays and Bisexuals (LGBs): Integrative Review of the Literatur

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, regarding studies with LG people, specifically, they have used, above all, the analytical approach centered on variables, that is, they seek to measure variables to explore links between risk, protection, and adaptive patterns through multivariate statistical analyses, without characterizing the individuality of the sample (Masten, 2015). In the systematic review of the literature between resilience and LG people performed by Lira and Morais (2018b), out of the 31 articles found in the electronic databases PsycINFO and PubMed up to 2015, only two studies used a quantitative person-centered approach (Bonanno, Moskowitz, Papa, & Folkman, 2005;Livingston et al, 2015). One of these studies, for example, was conducted by Livingston et al, by grouping of clusters, in which they classified distinct personality profiles among young LGB adults: adaptive (lower neuroticism and higher extroversion, kindness, awareness, and openness); and at risk (higher neuroticism and kindness, conscientiousness, and openness and lower extroversion).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, regarding studies with LG people, specifically, they have used, above all, the analytical approach centered on variables, that is, they seek to measure variables to explore links between risk, protection, and adaptive patterns through multivariate statistical analyses, without characterizing the individuality of the sample (Masten, 2015). In the systematic review of the literature between resilience and LG people performed by Lira and Morais (2018b), out of the 31 articles found in the electronic databases PsycINFO and PubMed up to 2015, only two studies used a quantitative person-centered approach (Bonanno, Moskowitz, Papa, & Folkman, 2005;Livingston et al, 2015). One of these studies, for example, was conducted by Livingston et al, by grouping of clusters, in which they classified distinct personality profiles among young LGB adults: adaptive (lower neuroticism and higher extroversion, kindness, awareness, and openness); and at risk (higher neuroticism and kindness, conscientiousness, and openness and lower extroversion).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%