2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2021.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodology for integrated multicriteria decision-making with uncertainty: Extending the compromise ranking method for uncertain evaluation of alternatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multicriteria group decision making (MCGDM) is one of the most important human activities [ 1 – 6 ]. Due to the complexity and vagueness of information in group decision making, however, it is usually difficult for decision makers to evaluate the alternatives by crisp numerical values [ 7 , 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multicriteria group decision making (MCGDM) is one of the most important human activities [ 1 – 6 ]. Due to the complexity and vagueness of information in group decision making, however, it is usually difficult for decision makers to evaluate the alternatives by crisp numerical values [ 7 , 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…selected criteria [14]. The best alternative will be the one with the lower distance to the ideal solution, which is an utopian solution that performs optimally (achieving the best evaluations) for all the criteria considered [7]. In particular, MIMDU includes a fuzzy version of the CRM (F-CRM), represented in Eqs.…”
Section: Sure (S) 15%mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, each FN is represented as a sequence of a discrete number of intervals for different cuts (from the bottom α =0, to the top α =1) according to different values of α. The reader is referred to [7] for an exhaustive explanation of the α-cut arithmetic.…”
Section: Sure (S) 15%mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, multicriteria decision support tools are needed to assess and design these solutions [8]. Moreover, uncertainty can arise when ranking and selecting the best alternative for a particular case [24], since the relative importance of one criterion in front of another may not be clear [25], and its evaluation may be difficult to quantify [26]. For example, it might be difficult to assess how much more or less important is the criterion "cost" compared to the criterion "ease of maintenance", since both might compromise the sustainability of the project but at a different phase or intensity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%