1991
DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(91)90300-q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methohexital and cocaine self-administration under fixed-ratio and second-order schedules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
11
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The peak rates of responding maintained by 4 μg/kg i.v. dose of THC in this study were similar to or greater than the peak rates of responding maintained by intravenous injections of cocaine, d-amphetamine, nicotine, methohexital or midazolam in previous studies using the same primate species and the same schedule of intravenous drug injection (Goldberg, 1973;Spear et al, 1991;Sannerud et al, 1994;Munzar et al, 2001). Interestingly, overall response rates, injections per session and total THC intake per session in this study with drug-naïve monkeys (Justinova et al, 2003) were greater than in our previous study (Tanda et al, 2000) in which monkeys had a previous history of cocaine self-administration.…”
Section: Self-administration Of Cannabinoids By Laboratory Animalssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The peak rates of responding maintained by 4 μg/kg i.v. dose of THC in this study were similar to or greater than the peak rates of responding maintained by intravenous injections of cocaine, d-amphetamine, nicotine, methohexital or midazolam in previous studies using the same primate species and the same schedule of intravenous drug injection (Goldberg, 1973;Spear et al, 1991;Sannerud et al, 1994;Munzar et al, 2001). Interestingly, overall response rates, injections per session and total THC intake per session in this study with drug-naïve monkeys (Justinova et al, 2003) were greater than in our previous study (Tanda et al, 2000) in which monkeys had a previous history of cocaine self-administration.…”
Section: Self-administration Of Cannabinoids By Laboratory Animalssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Under the present fixed-ratio schedule of intravenous drug self-administration, the optimum rates of responding maintained by THC were similar to or greater than the optimum rates of responding maintained by intravenous injections of cocaine, damphetamine, nicotine, methohexital or midazolam in previous studies using the same primate species and the same schedule of intravenous drug injection (Goldberg 1973;Spear et al 1991;Sannerud et al 1994;Munzar et al 2001). Vehicle substitution for THC immediately Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…A paradigm that provides an operational measure of incentive-motivation for drug administration is intravenous self-administration of drugs under a second-order schedule of reinforcement Everitt and Robbins 2000). This paradigm has been used extensively to study drug-seeking behavior in humans (Mello and Mendelson 1985;Henningfield et al 1987;Lamb et al 1991), non-human primates (Goldberg 1973;Katz 1979;Johanson 1982;Spear et al 1991;Spealman et al 1991;Negus et al 1995) and rats (Whitelaw et al 1996;Arroyo et al 1998;Markou et al 1999). In the second-order schedule paradigm, drugseeking behavior is assessed by the rates of responding during the first drug-free interval of the self-administration session.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%