Methylene blue adsorption onto granular activated carbon prepared from Harmal seeds residue

Tofighy, Maryam Ahmadzadeh; Mohammadi, Toraj

doi:10.1080/19443994.2013.797130

Cited by 22 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 53 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In recent years, membrane technology has received more attention as a suitable alternative to conventional separation techniques for water/wastewater treatment applications. − Among pressure-driven membrane separation processes, the ultrafiltration (UF) process with higher water flux and lower energy consumption and cost than reverse osmosis (RO) and nanofiltration (NF) processes is a good candidate for water/wastewater treatment applications. − …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Polyvinylidene Fluoride/Nanoclays (Cloisite 30B and Palygorskite) Mixed Matrix Membranes with Improved Performance and Antifouling Properties

Dehghankar

Mohammadi

Tavakolmoghadam

et al. 2021

Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, it was attempted to prove the effectiveness of nanoclays as economical and nontoxic nanofillers through comparison with carbon nanotubes (CNTs). Two hydrophilic nanoclays, namely, Cloisite 30B and palygorskite (PGS), were used as nanofillers to improve the morphology and performance of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) ultrafiltration (UF) membranes. A nonsolvent-induced phase separation (NIPS) method was used to prepare mixed matrix membranes (MMMs). The effects of the nanoclays on morphology, performance, and antifouling properties of the prepared MMMs were investigated. It was found that compared to PVDF membranes, the hydrophilicity, antifouling properties, and morphology of the fabricated MMMs are improved significantly. Compared to PVDF membranes, pure water flux (PWF) values of the MMMs containing the optimum contents of Cloisite 30B (0.5 wt %) and palygorskite (1 wt %) improved by 44.7 and 61.7%, respectively. Acid-treated CNTs were used as a reference additive, and the performance and antifouling properties of the prepared PVDF/nanoclay MMMs were compared with the prepared PVDF/acid-treated CNT MMMs. It was found that the PWF values of the MMM containing optimum contents of PGS and Cloisite 30B nanoclays are 86 and 77%, respectively, compared with that of the MMM containing acid-treated CNTs. The PVDF/Cloisite 30B MMM exhibited lower PWF than the PVDF/PGS MMM, which could be attributed to the plate-like structure of Cloisite 30B. Also, the flux recovery ratio (FRR) values of the mixed matrix membranes containing optimum contents of PGS and Cloisite 30B nanoclays were 95.65 and 92.06%, respectively, compared to that of the MMM containing acid-treated CNTs. Also, the BSA rejections of the prepared MMMs containing optimum contents of Cloisite 30B and palygorskite were comparable with that of the MMM containing acid-treated CNTs. Therefore, nanoclays can be suggested as economical and ecofriendly nanofillers for improving the PVDF membrane performance.

show abstract