2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.11.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial source tracking markers associated with domestic rainwater harvesting systems: Correlation to indicator organisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, results obtained in these studies indicate that MST markers correlate well with indicator organism analysis and assists in identifying the primary contamination sources of RHRW systems. 32,62,75 Understanding the source of contamination is crucial in the development of contamination prevention strategies and allows for the accurate estimation of the human health risk associated with utilizing a particular water source.…”
Section: Microbial Source Tracking In Roof-harvested Rainwatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, results obtained in these studies indicate that MST markers correlate well with indicator organism analysis and assists in identifying the primary contamination sources of RHRW systems. 32,62,75 Understanding the source of contamination is crucial in the development of contamination prevention strategies and allows for the accurate estimation of the human health risk associated with utilizing a particular water source.…”
Section: Microbial Source Tracking In Roof-harvested Rainwatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus well documented that the microbiological quality of RHRW is sub-standard and numerous research groups have reported on the detection of traditional indicator organisms (using culture-based analysis) such as total coliforms, faecal coliforms, Escherichia coli (E. coli) and enterococci species in rainwater (Kaushik et al, 2014;Waso et al, 2018;Hamilton et al, 2019). While the analysis of the indicator groups is routine in water quality monitoring, amongst other pitfalls, a poor correlation has been recorded between traditional indicator organisms and potentially pathogenic microorganisms (Harwood et al, 2005(Harwood et al, , 2014Field and Samadpour, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This marker thus has high specificity for the detection of human faecal matter and sewage in environmental waters (Harwood et al, 2014). Similarly, both Lachnospiraceae and adenovirus have been investigated as indicators of sewage and faecal pollution in environmental waters and could therefore provide valuable information on the health risks associated with the use of various water sources (Newton et al, 2011;McLellan et al, 2013;Sidhu et al, 2013;Rusiñol et al, 2016;Waso et al, 2018). Quantitative PCR analyses were used to identify and quantify the target bacterial pathogens, MST markers and indicator groups, whereafter the health risk associated with the utilisation of the RHRW for potable and various domestic activities (e.g., cleaning the house, laundry, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of coliform bacteria was present in rainwater because the rainwater might be contaminated with faecal coliform material deposited on the rooftop of the building by animals, rodent, or birds (28) or even due to environmental conditions surrounding the test site (29). In an unclean environment condition coliform bacteria able to multiply rapidly and contaminate the water (30).…”
Section: Coliform Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%