2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-7037(99)00292-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial sulfate reduction rates and sulfur and oxygen isotope fractionations at oil and gas seeps in deepwater Gulf of Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
190
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 330 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
12
190
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7). The δ 34 S/δ 18 O ratios increase with sulfate reduction rate and therefore a fixed ratio of 4:1 for δ 34 S/δ 18 O is not a reliable indicator of microbial sulfate reduction (Aharon and Fu, 2000; and this study). Fritz et al (1989) studied oxygen isotope exchange between sulfate and water during bacterial sulfate reduction.…”
Section: Variation Of δ 34 S/δ 18 O Ratios In Baritementioning
confidence: 55%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…7). The δ 34 S/δ 18 O ratios increase with sulfate reduction rate and therefore a fixed ratio of 4:1 for δ 34 S/δ 18 O is not a reliable indicator of microbial sulfate reduction (Aharon and Fu, 2000; and this study). Fritz et al (1989) studied oxygen isotope exchange between sulfate and water during bacterial sulfate reduction.…”
Section: Variation Of δ 34 S/δ 18 O Ratios In Baritementioning
confidence: 55%
“…Hence that oxidation of sulfide has not played a significant role in controlling the δ 34 S/δ 18 O ratios in barite. Aharon and Fu (2000) investigated the links between sulfate reduction rates and isotopic fractionation among individual point-source seeps. The δ 34 S/δ 18 O ratios from different sites varied between 1.4 and 3.5.…”
Section: Variation Of δ 34 S/δ 18 O Ratios In Baritementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations