2021
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.642439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbiome Sample Comparison and Search: From Pair-Wise Calculations to Model-Based Matching

Abstract: A huge quantity of microbiome samples have been accumulated, and more are yet to come from all niches around the globe. With the accumulation of data, there is an urgent need for comparisons and searches of microbiome samples among thousands of millions of samples in a fast and accurate manner. However, it is a very difficult computational challenge to identify similar samples, as well as identify their likely origins, among such a grand pool of samples from all around the world. Currently, several approaches … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, model-based methods such as neural networks are advantageous in source tracking. For example, once a rational model has been built, improved efficiency and accuracy of model-based methods can be achieved that is comparable to, or even better than, existing distance-based and unsupervised methods [61] , [123] . The same approach is suitable for gene mining issues [121] .…”
Section: The Dilemma Of Traditional Methods Could Be Solved By Deep L...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, model-based methods such as neural networks are advantageous in source tracking. For example, once a rational model has been built, improved efficiency and accuracy of model-based methods can be achieved that is comparable to, or even better than, existing distance-based and unsupervised methods [61] , [123] . The same approach is suitable for gene mining issues [121] .…”
Section: The Dilemma Of Traditional Methods Could Be Solved By Deep L...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…stages I, II, III and IV), and the purpose of classification in this context is to assign gut community samples to the correct stages of CRC [ 12 ]. Generally, the complexity of microbial community classification is positively correlated with the number of classes and negatively correlated with the number of community samples [ 13 ]. For a given context that involved multi-disease classes but limited number of samples, such as classification of 4026 samples from 28 case–control microbial studies spanning 10 diseases [ 14 ], low prediction accuracies are naturally expected for identification of disease-specific patterns, rending microbiome-based classification unpractical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faced with these contexts, current methods for microbial community classification have limitations in dealing with such paramount of complex relationships and biome-specific patterns. While it becomes extremely difficult when there exists biomes in which there are only a few samples, a ‘Big Data, Small Sample’ problem [ 13 ]. Random forest model is suitable for classification among numerus samples, and it has been used in many applications, such as chronological age prediction [ 15 ] and fecal source identification [ 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%