2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.08.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microcystic Macular Edema

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
64
3
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
64
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to the study of Abegg et al ,13 where they found that younger patients had a significantly higher chance of having microcystic changes then older patients. In our view, it is difficult to attribute this to age alone and future prospective studies addressing this question will need to be careful to avoid an inclusion bias due to the age distribution of various aetiologies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is in contrast to the study of Abegg et al ,13 where they found that younger patients had a significantly higher chance of having microcystic changes then older patients. In our view, it is difficult to attribute this to age alone and future prospective studies addressing this question will need to be careful to avoid an inclusion bias due to the age distribution of various aetiologies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been suggested that retrograde axonal degeneration influences the integrity of the retinal organisation and that loss of retinal Müller cell function may play a role in microcyst formation 4 8 10 13 14. Finally, vitreoretinal traction can lead to the formation of microcystic changes,5 7 but does not represent an unifying mechanism because it has conclusively shown to be absent in a number of cases 25.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Image analysis was done as described previously, using a custom-built segmentation software [1, 10]. This resulted in a single thickness value per retinal layer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%