“…Regarding intra-and interspecific variability, despite the large diversity of types found in the Heliconia species studied, cultivars exhibited high genetic similarity (Figures 1 and 3). High phenotypic and molecular variability has been found in other studies conducted on heliconias by Berry and Kress (1991), Kumar et al (1998), Marques et al (2004), Meléndez-Ackerman et al (2005), and Marouelli et al (2010). This study also indicated that H. psittacorum and the hybrid H. psittacorum x H. spathocircinata do not belong to the Heliconia subgenus, although most of the species analyzed in this study (H. bihai, H. caribaea, H. orthotricha, H. stricta, H. wagneriana, and H. aurea) did; rather, they belonged to the Stenochlamys Baker subgenus, Stenochlamys (Baker) Schum section , and were revealed to be grouped with the Heliconia subgenus (Figure 2).…”