2010
DOI: 10.1002/prca.200800093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microfiltration isolation of human urinary exosomes for characterization by MS

Abstract: In conclusion, we demonstrate a microfiltration isolation method that preserves the exosome structure, reduces contamination from higher abundant urinary proteins, and can be easily implemented into mass spectrometry analysis for biomarker discovery efforts or incorporation into routine clinical laboratory applications to yield higher sample throughput.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
159
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
159
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although many of the innate immune proteins identified in our analysis had been previously identified in urinary exosomal analyses (Supplemental Table 1), 12,13,[16][17][18][19][20][21] enrichment for this protein grouping has not previously been reported. However, enrichment analysis relies on the reliability of the background proteome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although many of the innate immune proteins identified in our analysis had been previously identified in urinary exosomal analyses (Supplemental Table 1), 12,13,[16][17][18][19][20][21] enrichment for this protein grouping has not previously been reported. However, enrichment analysis relies on the reliability of the background proteome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, most studies on urine exosomes to date have focused on biomarker discovery, resulting in the publication of several urine exosome protein compendia. 12,13,[16][17][18][19][20][21] Published reports of the urinary exosomal proteome have limited value in illuminating the potential functions of urinary exosomes for several reasons. First, protein identification by mass spectrometry (MS) has, until recently, yielded results with unacceptably low reproducibility and high false-positive rates, 22,23 and previous reports are not free of these limitations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UF can rapidly isolate EVs from body fluids [66,67], but the yield is low because of the loss of small size EVs, which have a similar size to protein aggregates, necessary to guarantee the purity [68]. …”
Section: Microfluidics-based Ev Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are suitable for most laboratories and easy to be utility, however, they are costly, especially if a large number of biological samples need to be processed. Besides that, various techniques including filtration [20][21][22], microfluidic-based method [23,24], immuno-affinity and peptide-based isolation [25], size-exclusion chromatography [26][27][28], and so on, have also been proposed for enrichment of exosomes. They have advantages and disadvantages, can be selected according to the experimental command.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%