2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microplastics in brown trout (Salmo trutta Linnaeus, 1758) from an Irish riverine system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…D'Souza et al (2020) found microplastics (500 μm to 5 mm) in the fecal and regurgitate remains of white‐throated dipper from four catchments in south Wales (UK) and discovered that particles were largely similar in morphology and size as those previously described in key prey items (i.e., Ephemeroptera and Trichoptera) for the same region (Windsor et al, 2019). We too observed similarities in the characteristics of microplastics recovered in spraints from the River Slaney catchment and those previously found in brown trout from the same catchment (O'Connor et al, 2020), particularly in regard to the dominance of fibers (94%) and larger particles (78%) (350 μm to ≤5 mm), though for brown trout, there was a considerable proportion of fragments recovered (GITs: 25%; stomach contents: 24%). Interestingly, concentrations recorded by D'Souza et al (2020) in dipper regurgitates (Wales, UK) were double that of spraints in the present study (7.65 ± 1.64 particles/g dw), while fecal samples contained over four times the concentration (15.85 ± 2.85 particles/g dw).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…D'Souza et al (2020) found microplastics (500 μm to 5 mm) in the fecal and regurgitate remains of white‐throated dipper from four catchments in south Wales (UK) and discovered that particles were largely similar in morphology and size as those previously described in key prey items (i.e., Ephemeroptera and Trichoptera) for the same region (Windsor et al, 2019). We too observed similarities in the characteristics of microplastics recovered in spraints from the River Slaney catchment and those previously found in brown trout from the same catchment (O'Connor et al, 2020), particularly in regard to the dominance of fibers (94%) and larger particles (78%) (350 μm to ≤5 mm), though for brown trout, there was a considerable proportion of fragments recovered (GITs: 25%; stomach contents: 24%). Interestingly, concentrations recorded by D'Souza et al (2020) in dipper regurgitates (Wales, UK) were double that of spraints in the present study (7.65 ± 1.64 particles/g dw), while fecal samples contained over four times the concentration (15.85 ± 2.85 particles/g dw).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Though sample sizes here were small, we found no difference in dietary composition between sampling season and sampling region, while no existing trend was observed with microplastic abundance or microplastic concentration. Interestingly however, the River Slaney catchment, which had the highest microplastic concentration of all regions, also had the highest occurrence of salmonids (Table 2) though estimated fork lengths of 66–117 mm were below the mean fork length of brown trout previously assessed for microplastics in this catchment (149 ± 42 mm; mean ± SD) (O'Connor et al, 2020). Overall, the estimated fork lengths of salmonids in the present study (66–150 mm) (River Slaney and southwestern region combined) are comparable to those documented elsewhere in Europe, where size classes recovered in otter diet were described as mostly “small” (Lyach & Čech, 2017; Marcolin et al, 2020; Miranda et al, 2006), suggesting a possible preference for smaller individuals, which have a higher catchability (Marcolin et al, 2020; Miranda et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Already in the paper by Thompson et al published in 2004, where the term “microplastics” was introduced for the first time, the identification of MPs from marine samples was performed by FTIR spectroscopy. Since then, this method remains most applicable in MP studies worldwide and has already shown to be efficient for the identification, quantification, and characterization of MP contaminations in aquatic ,,,,, and terrestrial , environments, in influents, effluents, and sludge of WWTPs, ,, in ambient air ,, as well as in drinking water ,, and food. ,, …”
Section: Chemical Analysis Of Microplasticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies reviewed evinced the presence of theses pollutants in crustaceans, molluscs, and fish (Tables 2 and 3). There are studies reporting noteworthy levels: 287,527 particles/fish, 103-183 particles/fish, and 2.19 particles/individual [86][87][88]. MPs intake range: 2 × 10 −5 -33,626 particles/day.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%