2012
DOI: 10.1227/neu.0b013e3182356269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microplate-Bridge Technique for Watertight Dural Closures in the Combined Petrosal Approach

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Although the combined petrosal approach has significant advantages for medium to large petroclival lesions, it carries the risk of a few major complications. The cerebrospinal fluid leak rate with this approach has been reported to be as high as 15%. OBJECTIVE: To describe an innovative technique of watertight dural closure with a long microplate-bridge technique for the combined petrosal approach. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of note, none of these 10 cases needed postoperative CSF drainage; In addition, only 1 patient required revision surgery due to subcutaneous fluid collection, and none of the remaining 9 patients experienced any dural reconstruction-related complications, such as CSF leakage or postsurgical infection. In recent expert series, the CSF leakage rate after a transpetrosal approach was 5% to 15% 11,12 . In this context, we consider the CSF leakage rate of our PGA felt group (10%) to be acceptable.…”
Section: Key Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of note, none of these 10 cases needed postoperative CSF drainage; In addition, only 1 patient required revision surgery due to subcutaneous fluid collection, and none of the remaining 9 patients experienced any dural reconstruction-related complications, such as CSF leakage or postsurgical infection. In recent expert series, the CSF leakage rate after a transpetrosal approach was 5% to 15% 11,12 . In this context, we consider the CSF leakage rate of our PGA felt group (10%) to be acceptable.…”
Section: Key Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this problem of incomplete closure, various dural substitutes have been used in skull base surgeries [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] . Autologous transplants, including temporal fascia, pericranium flap, and fascia lata, are the most popular materials among neurosurgeons because autografts minimize the likelihood of immunoreactivity and induction of an inflammatory response 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adopted principles of dural reconstruction with multilayer closure, similar to those used in skull base reconstruction. 6,8 We reconstructed the posterior elements with titanium mesh fortified with an MMA layer. This reconstruction was critical to the successful outcome because it eliminated the dead space created by the laminectomy defects and provided a barrier to CSF egress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presigmoid approach is also complicated by difficult dural closure, increased risk of spinal fluid leak, and increased risk of hearing loss. [ 13 26 29 ] With multiple reports that suggest the equivalence in achieving the surgical goals between presigmoid and retrosigmoid approaches in even the most complex petroclival pathology, the ideal approach for an individual lesion remains controversial particularly for those deemed accessible by both techniques. [ 6 16 17 20 25 27 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%