2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microsatellite instability as a marker of prognosis and response to therapy: A meta-analysis of colorectal cancer survival data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

16
263
2
15

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 346 publications
(307 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
16
263
2
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Two systematic reviews and meta-analyses have indicated improved overall survival (OS) in patients with MSI CRC compared with MSS tumours (Guastadisegni et al, 2010;Popat et al, 2005). Popat et al, stratified survival in CRC patients depending on MMR status and found improved OS in MSI CRC versus MSS (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.65; 95% CI: 0.59-0.71; heterogeneity P = 0.16; I 2 = 20%).…”
Section: Universal Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Two systematic reviews and meta-analyses have indicated improved overall survival (OS) in patients with MSI CRC compared with MSS tumours (Guastadisegni et al, 2010;Popat et al, 2005). Popat et al, stratified survival in CRC patients depending on MMR status and found improved OS in MSI CRC versus MSS (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.65; 95% CI: 0.59-0.71; heterogeneity P = 0.16; I 2 = 20%).…”
Section: Universal Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In prospectively col- (Andre et al, 2015;Gavin et al, 2013;Guastadisegni et al, 2010;Klingbiel et al, 2015;Popat et al, 2005;Roth et al, 2012;Sinicrope et al, 2015). lected tumor tissue MSI was detected in 314 of 2580 stage-III CRCs and was prognostic overall for time to relapse (TTR), but not for DFS or OS (Sinicrope et al, 2013a).…”
Section: Msi As a Biomarker With Cetuximab Adjuvant Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Deficient MMR can result from a germline mutation in an MMR gene (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2), that is, Lynch syndrome (LS). dMMR CRCs are notable for greater survivability, particularly in Stage II/III CRC 28, 30, 31. Retrospective studies have demonstrated improved survival in patients with MMR‐competent tumors after receiving 5‐FU‐based chemotherapy 32, 33.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 More importantly, MSI-H colorectal cancer is known as a better prognostic phenotype than MSI-low and microsatellite-stable (MSS) colorectal cancers. [3][4][5] Regarding the prognostic implications of MSI-H colorectal cancer, we previously reported an interesting result in which patients with CpG island methylator phenotypehigh (CIMP-H) displayed worse survival than those with CIMP-low/negative (CIMP-L/0) in MSI-H colorectal cancer. 6 Although the prognostic value of CIMP has been controversial in colorectal cancer, 1,[6][7][8][9] our previous study implied that MSI-H colorectal cancer is not a molecularly and prognostically homogeneous phenotype; therefore, it could be classified into prognostic subgroups depending on its underlying genetic or epigenetic status.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%