2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0969-2126(02)00827-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microtubule Structure at 8 Å Resolution

Abstract: We have obtained a 3D reconstruction of intact microtubules, using cryoelectron microscopy and image processing, at a resolution of about 8 A, sufficient to resolve much of the secondary structure. The level of detail in the map allows docking of the tubulin structure previously determined by electron crystallography, with very strong constraints, providing several important insights not previously available through docking tubulin into lower-resolution maps. This work provides an improved picture of the inter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

28
388
3
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 386 publications
(421 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
28
388
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Variability within a range of Ϯ0.2 nm in the relative position of tubulin dimers on adjacent PFs was also observed in these studies and interpreted as the result of thermally driven deformations of the lateral contacts between PFs (19,38). Electron crystallography maps obtained at 8-and 20-Å resolution give insight about the molecular origin of longitudinal and lateral interactions in MTs (41,42). One key structural element in determining lateral interactions between dimers is a long loop (the S7-H9 loop, also called ''M-loop''; Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Variability within a range of Ϯ0.2 nm in the relative position of tubulin dimers on adjacent PFs was also observed in these studies and interpreted as the result of thermally driven deformations of the lateral contacts between PFs (19,38). Electron crystallography maps obtained at 8-and 20-Å resolution give insight about the molecular origin of longitudinal and lateral interactions in MTs (41,42). One key structural element in determining lateral interactions between dimers is a long loop (the S7-H9 loop, also called ''M-loop''; Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Structural studies have shown the pores to be large enough (1.5 nm ϫ 2.5 nm) to allow Taxol (Ϸ1 nm) to pass (11,12), but it has been suggested that the association rate of Taxol measured by using stopped-flow techniques is too fast to be explained by the pores (38,46). A recent study by Diaz et al (47) examined Taxol-binding kinetics to gluteraldehyde cross-linked MTs in the presence and absence of exterior-bound MAPs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Taxol affects MT structure by decreasing protofilament number (8) and increasing MT flexibility (9,10). The Taxolbinding site has been localized to the luminal face of ␤ tubulin and is accessible through 2-nm pores in the MT wall (11)(12)(13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These loops coordinate lateral interactions between protofilaments to build a microtubule. Studies docking the tubulin dimer structure into high-resolution images of microtubules have established that M loops interact with N loops of laterally adjacent subunits (Li et al, 2002). Moreover, organisms with increased microtubule stability (such as arctic fish) have two amino acid substitutions in the ␣-tubulin M loop, Ala278Thr and Ser287Thr (Detrich et al, 2000).…”
Section: Some Mutations Localize To Domains That Coordinate Protofilamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When oryzalin was inserted into the ␣-tubulin binding site within the microtubule structure, it was situated beneath the N loop between protofilaments in the microtubule ( Figure 5B). Studies fitting the tubulin dimer structure into high-resolution cryoelectron microscopy images of microtubules have established that protofilament-protofilament contact is mediated by N loops interacting with M loops of laterally adjacent subunits (Li et al, 2002). Oryzalin bound beneath the N loop may inhibit N loop interaction with the M loop of the adjacent protofilament ( Figure 5B, enlargement) with the consequence of microtubule disruption.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%