2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2015.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mid-Neoproterozoic angular unconformity in the Yangtze Block revisited: Insights from detrital zircon U–Pb age and Hf–O isotopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison of detrital zircon ages of metasedimentary rocks with similar depositional age in the Chinese CTB and Yili Block (this study; Huang et al, ), Tarim Craton (He, Zhu, & Ge, ; He, Zhu, Ge, Zheng, & Wu, ), North China Craton (Luo et al, ; Wan et al, ; Xia, Sun, Zhao & Luo, ; Xia, Sun, Zhao, Wu, et al, ), Siberian Craton (Glorie et al, ; Khudoley et al, ; Powerman et al, ), Amazonian Craton (Babinski et al, 2013; Geraldes et al, ), Yangtze Block (Wang et al, ; Yang et al, ), Cathaysia Block (Yao et al, ; Yu et al, , ), African (Anderson et al, ; Babinski, et al, ; Foster et al, ; Konopásek et al, ; Linol et al, ), Antarctican (Grew et al, ; Marschall et al, ; Takamura et al, ; Wang et al, ), and Indian blocks (Collins et al, ; Dharmapriya et al, ; Li et al, ; Plavsa et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Comparison of detrital zircon ages of metasedimentary rocks with similar depositional age in the Chinese CTB and Yili Block (this study; Huang et al, ), Tarim Craton (He, Zhu, & Ge, ; He, Zhu, Ge, Zheng, & Wu, ), North China Craton (Luo et al, ; Wan et al, ; Xia, Sun, Zhao & Luo, ; Xia, Sun, Zhao, Wu, et al, ), Siberian Craton (Glorie et al, ; Khudoley et al, ; Powerman et al, ), Amazonian Craton (Babinski et al, 2013; Geraldes et al, ), Yangtze Block (Wang et al, ; Yang et al, ), Cathaysia Block (Yao et al, ; Yu et al, , ), African (Anderson et al, ; Babinski, et al, ; Foster et al, ; Konopásek et al, ; Linol et al, ), Antarctican (Grew et al, ; Marschall et al, ; Takamura et al, ; Wang et al, ), and Indian blocks (Collins et al, ; Dharmapriya et al, ; Li et al, ; Plavsa et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The Yangtze Block in the South China could neither be the potential origin for the CTB, since detrital zircons from Meso‐Neoproterozoic sediments in the Yangtze Block have age peaks at ca. 2.4–2.5 and 3.5 Ga with only inconspicuous peak at 1.4–1.6 Ga (Figure f; Wang et al, ; Yang et al, ). For the same reasons, the African (Figure h; Anderson et al, ; Babinski et al, ; Foster et al, ; Konopásek et al, ; Linol et al, ), Antarctican (Figure l; Grew et al, ; Marschall et al, ; Takamura et al, ; Wang et al, ), Indian (Figure j; Collins et al, ; Dharmapriya et al, ; Li et al, ; Plavsa et al, ), and Australian blocks (Figures b–d; Smits et al, , and references therein) are also excluded for the CTB's origin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Predominant detrital zircons in the Sibao Group have Neoproterozoic ages ranging from 980 to 822 Ma, and the youngest grains have a weighted mean age of 835.3 ± 3.6 Ma (Wang et al, 2012b), giving the maximum depositional age of the group at 830 Ma (Yang et al, 2015). The weighted mean age of 824 ± 5 Ma of the mafic-ultramafic dykes and granitoids, intruded into the Sibao Group, constrains the group deposited in a short time interval of 830 Ma to 824 Ma (Wang et al, 2012b;Yang et al, 2015). The age of a tuffaceous siltstone from the upper Danzhou Group is 801 ± 4 to 778 ± 5 Ma (Gao et al, 2013;Cui et al, 2016).…”
Section: Yangtze Cratonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cawood et al 2017), although the exact nature of this suturing remains a subject of debate (e.g. Charvet 2013; see discussions in Yang et al 2016 andWang et al 2014). Subsequent to that suturing, during the late Neoproterozoic, the Yangtze Block became an extensive shallow-marine carbonate platformslope-basin ( Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%