Mid-term low back pain improvement after total hip arthroplasty in 306 patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip

Jia, Cheng-Qi; Wu, Yujie; Cao, Shougen; Hu, Fanqi; Zheng, Zhirong; Xu, Chi

doi:10.1186/s13018-023-03701-z

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…DDH also causes pain and instability in the hip joint, which can be problematic in daily life. Many patients with DDH also have low back pain [4][5][6][7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Specific pelvic shape in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip on 3D morphometric homologous model analysis

Sasaki,

Suzuki,

Tokita

et al. 2024

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To clarify the morphological factors of the pelvis in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), three-dimensional (3D) pelvic morphology was analyzed using a template-fitting technique. Methods Three-dimensional pelvic data of 50 patients with DDH (DDH group) and 3D pelvic data of 50 patients without obvious pelvic deformity (Normal group) were used. All patients were female. A template model was created by averaging the normal pelvises into a symmetrical and isotropic mesh. Next, 100 homologous models were generated by fitting the pelvic data of each group of patients to the template model. Principal component analysis was performed on the coordinates of each vertex (15,235 vertices) of the pelvic homologous model. In addition, a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated from the sensitivity of DDH positivity for each principal component, and principal components for which the area under the curve was significantly large were extracted (p<0.05). Finally, which components of the pelvic morphology frequently seen in DDH patients are related to these extracted principal components was evaluated. Results The first, third, and sixth principal components showed significantly larger areas under the ROC curves. The morphology indicated by the first principal component was associated with a decrease in coxal inclination in both the coronal and horizontal planes. The third principal component was related to the sacral inclination in the sagittal plane. The sixth principal component was associated with narrowing of the superior part of the pelvis. Conclusion The most important factor in the difference between normal and DDH pelvises was the change in the coxal angle in both the coronal and horizontal planes. That is, in the anterior and superior views, the normal pelvis is a triangle, whereas in DDH, it was more like a quadrilateral.

show abstract

“…DDH also causes pain and instability in the hip joint, which can be problematic in daily life. Many patients with DDH also have low back pain [4][5][6][7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%