2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.04.085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Middle Fossa Approach for Vestibular Schwannoma: Good Hearing and Facial Nerve Outcomes with Low Morbidity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the most recent guidelines on surgical management of small VSs did not give recommendation for surgery as primary treatment . The presence of a distal internal auditory canal CSF fundal cap was another prognostic factor of hearing preservation, even if some authors did not find an association with better outcome . It is fundamental to identify prognostic indicators other than tumor size in order to help clinicians in the decision‐making process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the most recent guidelines on surgical management of small VSs did not give recommendation for surgery as primary treatment . The presence of a distal internal auditory canal CSF fundal cap was another prognostic factor of hearing preservation, even if some authors did not find an association with better outcome . It is fundamental to identify prognostic indicators other than tumor size in order to help clinicians in the decision‐making process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,53,55,62,63 There are both primary studies supporting and arguing against each of the following variables as predictors of HP: good preoperative hearing, tumor location, calorics, and other ABR parameters such as wave amplitude, latency, or interpeak interval. 22,25,39,42,45,47,51,53,55,59,60,[64][65][66][67] A literature review was performed to analyze data on hearing outcomes after MCF resection (►Table 5). While ABR was the most commonly utilized technique, a wide variety of monitoring methodologies were used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VS size was found to be strongly associated with likelihood for post-operatively FN palsy with smaller tumors having a lower likelihood (Cerullo et al, 1993;Kazim et al, 2011). The traditional paradigm of GTR of CPA tumors to minimize disease recurrence has to be balanced against the frequent occurrence of a permanent FN paresis/paralysis (King and Morrison, 1980;Gantz et al, 1986;Nadol et al, 1987Nadol et al, , 1992Bentivoglio et al, 1988;Moulin et al, 1995;Mass et al, 1999;Bento et al, 2002;Elsmore and Mendoza, 2002;Magnan et al, 2002;Couloigner et al, 2003;Mangham, 2004;Samii et al, 2006Samii et al, , 2010Seol et al, 2006;Yang et al, 2008;Gerganov et al, 2009Gerganov et al, , 2010Silva et al, 2012;Sharma et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2013;Setty et al, 2015;Aristegui Ruiz et al, 2016;Raheja et al, 2016;Roessler et al, 2016;Taddei et al, 2016;D'Amico et al, 2017;Hoshide et al, 2018; Tables 1, 5, 6). FN preservation surgery is justifiable, when acceptable extent-of-resection and good long-term control tumor rates are achievable (Seol et al, 2006;D'Amico et al, 2017;Bernardeschi et al, 2018;Zumofen et al, 2018).…”
Section: Causes Of Intracranial Facial Nerve Injury After Cpa-tumor Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eighty percent of them improved on follow-up to some degree and again, out of those, 28% experienced a complete recovery of their FN function. Only two studies (Gantz et al, 1986 ; Raheja et al, 2016 ) report to have achieved complete GTR-rates exclusively via the MCF approach in n = 121 individuals, 34% of which suffered from post-operative FN impairment. Ten studies (Tator and Nedzelski, 1982 ; Kirkpatrick et al, 1993 ; Magliulo et al, 1998 ; Fenton et al, 2002 ; Colletti and Fiorino, 2003 ; Isaacson et al, 2005 ; Neff et al, 2005 ; Esquia-Medina et al, 2009 ; Matsui, 2012 ; Torres et al, 2017 ) report on complete GTR-rates in n = 734 individuals using a selected variation of surgical approaches.…”
Section: Systematic Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%