2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.fbp.2010.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Millet–legume blended extrudates characteristics and process optimization using RSM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
6
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gujska and Khan () reported 3× of an increase in WHC of extruded bean flours (navy, pinto, and chickpea), ranging from 1.2 to 4.0 g/g relative to unextruded flours. The increase in WHC with higher temperature and moisture was also reported by Kumar, Sarkar, and Sharma (), Seth, Badwaik, and Ganapathy (), Ding, Ainsworth, Tucker, and Marson (), and Chakraborty, Singh, Kumbhar, and Chakraborty () for rice–carrot pomace blend, yam–corn–rice blend, rice flour and millet–legume blend, respectively. After extrusion, starch granules are more disrupted and therefore can bind more water (Seth et al, ), and a higher moisture content further promotes starch gelatinization (Donovan, ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Gujska and Khan () reported 3× of an increase in WHC of extruded bean flours (navy, pinto, and chickpea), ranging from 1.2 to 4.0 g/g relative to unextruded flours. The increase in WHC with higher temperature and moisture was also reported by Kumar, Sarkar, and Sharma (), Seth, Badwaik, and Ganapathy (), Ding, Ainsworth, Tucker, and Marson (), and Chakraborty, Singh, Kumbhar, and Chakraborty () for rice–carrot pomace blend, yam–corn–rice blend, rice flour and millet–legume blend, respectively. After extrusion, starch granules are more disrupted and therefore can bind more water (Seth et al, ), and a higher moisture content further promotes starch gelatinization (Donovan, ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…However, the effect of feed moisture on WAI was nonsignificant. Ding et al (); Chakraborty, Singh, Kumbhar, and Chakraborty () also supported this result. The result in Table shows highly significant nature of the model ( p < 0.0001) along with reasonable agreement of predicted (0.91) and adjusted R ‐Squared values (0.98).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…S3a,b). The relationship between WAI and starch degradation because of heat treatment has been reported by many researchers (Guha et al, 1997;Chakraborty et al, 2011;Balasubramanian et al, 2011a,b). The relationship between WAI and starch degradation because of heat treatment has been reported by many researchers (Guha et al, 1997;Chakraborty et al, 2011;Balasubramanian et al, 2011a,b).…”
Section: Water Absorption Index (Wai)mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In other words, WSI can be used as an indicator of starch conversion during extrusion (Ding et al, 2005). The negative correlation of WAI and WSI has been reported by many researchers (Chakraborty et al, 2011;Balasubramanian et al, 2011a,b). The coefficient estimates of WSI model showed that the square terms of all the levels of ingredients had highly significant negative effects (Table 2).…”
Section: Water Solubility Index (Wsi)mentioning
confidence: 86%