Land Use Competition 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-33628-2_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mind the GAP: Vietnamese Rice Farmers and Distal Markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interdisciplinary studies in the LSS literature have made similar efforts to integrate actor networks and tackle diverse governance arrangements for land change by engaging with, for example, the Global Production Network (GPN) framework (e.g., [75][76][77]) and with multi-level or polycentric governance analysis (e.g., [8,9,78]). Such approaches present telecoupling research with the means to deal with connectivity between distant actors and outcomes in land systems, as well as their social, institutional, and territorial embeddedness in transnational production networks [21].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interdisciplinary studies in the LSS literature have made similar efforts to integrate actor networks and tackle diverse governance arrangements for land change by engaging with, for example, the Global Production Network (GPN) framework (e.g., [75][76][77]) and with multi-level or polycentric governance analysis (e.g., [8,9,78]). Such approaches present telecoupling research with the means to deal with connectivity between distant actors and outcomes in land systems, as well as their social, institutional, and territorial embeddedness in transnational production networks [21].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars have emphasized the need for LSS to engage with relational understandings of place and space found in critical human and economic geography (e.g., Massey 1991, Henderson et al 2002, Jessop et al 2008) to move beyond, for example, hierarchically nested scale conceptualizations that often result in a conflation of spatial scale with agency . Others have stressed that places and placebased change should always be analyzed as the result of the (social) relations, interactions, and processes that connect them to other places (Mansfield et al 2010, Niewöhner et al 2016. That "places are processes too" (Massey 1991:29) is increasingly acknowledged by scholars working on urban dynamics and landuse change, who argue for a recognition of the mutually constitutive processes linking specific urban and rural places regardless of their geographical location (Seitzinger et al 2012, Seto et al 2012, Güneralp et al 2013, Qureshi and Haase 2014.…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the banana case in mind, we could, for example, have turned to the global production network framework from economic geography (Henderson et al 2002, Challies 2008, Coe and Yeung 2015 for analyzing the economic telecoupling identified, as is increasingly done in LSS (e.g., Galvan-Miyoshi et al 2015, Hauge 2016. The global production network offers a comprehensive framework for understanding flows and distribution of power and value, as well as the social, institutional, and territorial embeddedness of actors in transnational production networks (Coe and Yeung 2015).…”
Section: Remaining Challenges and Ways Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have explored consumer preferences in developing markets for foods that are produced, transported or stored using sustainable methods (Loureiro et al , 2002; Ali et al , 2010; Gao et al , 2020). Consumers play a major role in bringing about more sustainable food production through their food choices, such that agriculture in these economies has shifted from a “production orientation” to a “consumer orientation,” through which more affluent consumers may demand food products that can improve the livelihoods of farmers and the environment (Caswell and Siny, 2007; Hauge, 2016; Jaffee et al , 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%