Waterborne Pathogens 2014
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-59543-0.00010-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Miniaturized Detection Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
(160 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the target molecule needs to be isolated from non-specific molecules before being analyzed by a biosensor. It has been demonstrated that the detection of raw samples that undergo a separation step prior to introduction to a biosensing surface is more efficient [ 56 ]. The separation of the target molecules can be realized with different tools/techniques, such as micromixing [ 57 ], immunomagnetic beads [ 58 ], dielectrophoresis (DEP) [ 59 ], filtration [ 60 ] and centrifugation [ 61 ].…”
Section: Fet Sensor Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the target molecule needs to be isolated from non-specific molecules before being analyzed by a biosensor. It has been demonstrated that the detection of raw samples that undergo a separation step prior to introduction to a biosensing surface is more efficient [ 56 ]. The separation of the target molecules can be realized with different tools/techniques, such as micromixing [ 57 ], immunomagnetic beads [ 58 ], dielectrophoresis (DEP) [ 59 ], filtration [ 60 ] and centrifugation [ 61 ].…”
Section: Fet Sensor Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microfluidics has been proposed for the sample processing and monitoring of waterborne pathogens, with a greater emphasis in previous work being placed on the detection stages [1]. Some microfluidics waterborne pathogen sample processing has been demonstrated, e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%