2017
DOI: 10.1097/id.0000000000000603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally Invasive Approach Based on Pterygoid and Short Implants for Rehabilitation of an Extremely Atrophic Maxilla

Abstract: This surgical approach, based on the combination of short implants in the premaxillary regions and pterygoid implants in the pterygomaxillary regions, represents a way to shorten treatment timing, minimize the risk of surgical complications, and reduce patient discomfort and costs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Pterygoid implants in a full-arch rehabilitation obtain an optimal distribution of functional loads thanks to a wider implant-prosthetic polygon. Apart from a case report without immediate loading [31], the use of bilateral pterygoid implants associated with two to four standard fixtures in the anterior zone, with a flapless approach, has been reported by Stefanelli et al [26] for the immediate loading full-arch rehabilitation of the upper jaw. These authors adopted the dynamic navigation implantology after a digital accurate planning to reduce the risk of anatomical injuries and to facilitate prosthetic management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pterygoid implants in a full-arch rehabilitation obtain an optimal distribution of functional loads thanks to a wider implant-prosthetic polygon. Apart from a case report without immediate loading [31], the use of bilateral pterygoid implants associated with two to four standard fixtures in the anterior zone, with a flapless approach, has been reported by Stefanelli et al [26] for the immediate loading full-arch rehabilitation of the upper jaw. These authors adopted the dynamic navigation implantology after a digital accurate planning to reduce the risk of anatomical injuries and to facilitate prosthetic management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pterygoid implant, 13 to 20 mm long, works as the distal support for a prosthetic structure in the rehabilitation of posterior maxilla, avoiding any kind of distal cantilever; it by-passes the maxillary sinus and finds the primary stability involving the cortex of the pterygoid process of the sphenoid, the pyramidal process of the palatine bone after passing through the tuber maxillae. Tulasne introduced their use in 1989 to obviate the low density of the bone distally to the sinus [31]. This technique does not depend on the level of atrophy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for some situations such as extremely atrophic maxilla, this kind of treatment is often a challenge due to anatomical factors. Deficient bone height and thickness in the anterior region of the maxilla, and inadequate residual bone height due to maxillary expansion and/or resorption of alveolar bone with low bone density and quality are common in posterior regions of the maxilla, this generates inadequate dimensions of the ridge for the three-dimensional implant placement (Cucchi et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grades IV and V are considered as extreme atrophies [4]. The most common alternatives in atrophic maxilla rehabilitation are bone grafting [5], pterygoid [6] or zygomatic implants [7], bone regeneration (with or without mesh) [8,9], and finally, short implants [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%