2001
DOI: 10.1007/s002640000187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally invasive disc surgery: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9,10 There is an increasing trend for using endoscopic spine surgery in the spine society, driven by the current relevance given to postsurgical quality of life and recovery time. 11,12 This review article discusses the characteristics of the TELD technique and describes the indications and technical tips to achieve reliable clinical success while preventing unexpected surgical complications. These guidelines will help spine surgeons learn about endoscopic spine surgery and apply it in actual practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10 There is an increasing trend for using endoscopic spine surgery in the spine society, driven by the current relevance given to postsurgical quality of life and recovery time. 11,12 This review article discusses the characteristics of the TELD technique and describes the indications and technical tips to achieve reliable clinical success while preventing unexpected surgical complications. These guidelines will help spine surgeons learn about endoscopic spine surgery and apply it in actual practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 Consequently, the need for minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) is growing as the aging population is dramatically increasing and people pay more attention to quality-of-life issues. 4,5 Moreover, endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) is a subset of MISS that has been evolving rapidly and continuously to help treat elderly patients to relieve pain. 6,7 The advantages of ESS are widely touted to include less injury to paraspinal ligaments and muscles, less extensive epidural scar, feasibility under local anesthesia, minimal neural manipulation, less intraoperative blood loss, a lower infection rate, and a shorter hospital stay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%