2021
DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) Versus Traditional Open Approach

Abstract: Traditional open approaches in lumbar spine surgery are associated with increased rates of perioperative blood loss, prolonged hospital admissions, and acute postoperative pain scores compared with similar cases performed with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques. Here, we provide evidence supporting 3 key benefits of a minimally invasive spine surgery technique for transforaminal interbody lumbar fusion (TLIF): (1) improved postoperative patient mobilization, (2) accelerated discharge times, and (3) lo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Publication Types

Select...

Relationship

0
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 0 publications
references
References 45 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance

No citations

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?